THE PARTY WALL ACT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME INSURANCE HORSES LAW RIGHTS SITE INDEX TRANSPORT WHISTLEBLOWING |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR - The legal height for a row of evergreens like this is two meters. You can see from the six foot fencing panel on the right that the height of these trees is more like fourteen feet. Russell Pike trimmed these trees to just over 12 feet in 2012. When asked why he had not cut them to the correct legal height, he replied that he thought twelve feet was the legal height under the Antisocial Behaviour Act 2003. If you check this out on any Government website you will see that it is 6 feet 6 inches or two meters. These trees are unlawful, they belonged to Peter and June Townley at the time of making application WD/2016/0809/F, that invoked the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 as part of the conditions attaching to conversion of garages and other buildings to a granny annex.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|