Certificate of Lawful Existing Use or Development - CLEUD




  David Whibley, enforcement officer Wealden District Council 


DAVID WHIBLEY - Is still at it today, taking photographs and feeding them to his chums in Wealden's legal department. The middle picture was taken over 10 years ago when Whibley attempted to enter the BushyWood animal sanctuary illegally. Nelson Kruschandl snapped this beauty as he challenged the right of Wealden's storm troopers to be on this site near Hailsham. Kruschandl asked to see their authorisation from the Area South planning committee, on pain of citizens arrest. Whibley could not provide that authority making the site visit unlawful - and they beat a hasty retreat.





David Whibley,
Wealden District Council,
Vicarage Lane,
East Sussex BN27 2AX

Dear Mr. Whibley,

I sent WDC a replacement affidavit recently detailing an enforcement report that I saw relating to the Old Steamhouse, Lime Park, Herstmonceux. You were at pains to advise members that the owner / occupant had a criminal record, and you failed to marshal the facts as to the historic origins of the structure.

I became acquainted with the planning applications relating to Bridge Farm, Horam over the years. 1) WD/77/1449/X, 2) WD/79/2955, 3) WD/81/1898, 4) WD/90/3572, and 5) WD/95/2908 represent an incomplete list.

Please correct me if I am wrong, but nowhere is there to be found any mention of Peter Basil Digweed's criminal record in any of your executive's reports.

My recollection is a little hazy, but I believe the facts and circumstances of the offence ran thus. C. 1970, Mr. Digweed, together with an accomplice, Mr. A Lower, skimmed off live chicken from a Ford “A” series lorry to a Bedford CF 30cwt pick-up after the lorry had collected a load in the Reigate area and then been weighed off at a weighbridge. It therefore delivered short weight. This was fraud. Should you require further and better particulars someone may volunteer a newspaper clipping if this communication is put on the internet.

There would have been ample opportunity for a consistent and non discriminatory executive to give a little “background” where the subsequent planning frauds executed via various agents were inaccurate S.27 notices ( no newspaper advertisement ), and an uphill drainage run in 1), developing land which he did not own, regularised in 2), no newspaper advertisement and fraudulent traffic estimates which triggered the Direction to Refuse threat via the Chairman Preddy correspondence in 3), an inaccurate S.27 notice which gave your executive a lie to nurse for c. 1,915 days in 4) and no newspaper advertisement initially, plus the shenanigans over a S.27 notice ( that was supposedly attributable to P. B. Digweed ) and were explored in great detail in my complaint to Lord Newton's panel in 5). 

So was the secret Steamhouse report 


1 ) discriminatory, 
2)  inconsistent, 
3)  both inconsistent & discriminatory, 

4)  either 1, 2, or 3 combined with a failure to marshal the facts?

If I can be of any further assistance do not hesitate to contact me.


Chester Hudson                                     By email and Recorded Delivery AI423084526GB.

Zurich Municipal Fraud Team,
The Zurich Centre,
3000 Parkway,
Hants. PO15 7JZ. 


Recorded delivery KK 3340 7239 8GB


For presentation to the underwriters responsible for assessing the risk on shared legal indemnity policy no. QLA 17H 089 0093.


Beating a hasty retreat


RETREAT MEN - You cannot be a team player in a planning department that still includes known liars and not become tainted. You become part of the conspiracy to cover up. Recently, it was confirmed that despite perjuring himself and acting with Doug Moss in a conspiracy to re-date attribute photographs, in an attempt to gain a court order, that David Phillips is still working with Wealden District Council. Why? And why has he not been prosecuted for that perjury? Being a conspirator is just as damning. So why has Doug Moss not been prosecuted alongside David Phillips. There is no statutory time bar to investigating such crimes. This council actually paid for a barrister's opinion to assuage the criminal actions of J. D. Moss. That is public money that was spent for a cover up, rather than to expose a corrupt officer. Who authorized that payment? Who drafted the instruction to the barrister?



The Fourth Reich, the enemy within






Section 4    -    Fraud by abuse of position  [such as a planning or police officer]


(1) A person is in breach of this section if he —

(a) occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another   


(b) dishonestly abuses that position, and

(c) intends, by means of the abuse of that position—

(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

(2)A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.



Protection from Harassment Act 1997

1 Prohibition of harassment.

(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
(a) which amounts to harassment of another and
(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

2 Offence of harassment.

(1) A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of [F1section 1(1) or (1A)] is guilty of an offence.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both.





Wealden District Council's logo - Links to WDC corruption


Below is WDC's Planning Enforcement Officer's advertised geographical area of cover. But please note that they like to play in each others area when a case gets too hot to handle - and where does Christine Arnold and David Whibley fit into all of this. If you have been threatened with an enforcement visit, why not ask us to come along for free planning advice and as a witness to ensure fair play. We'd particularly like to meet other officers from this council's enforcement team, such as Niall Mileman and Tom Holman, or any of their solicitors, to find out who is running the show.



Niall Mileman

Craig Moon

Tom Holman





Chalvington with Ripe






East Hoathly





Forest Row

Hadlow Down

Cuckmere Valley


Heathfield and Waldron

East Dean and Friston











Little Horsted 




Long Man









Willingdon and Jevington



UK Prime Minister Tony Blair laughs as California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger looks on.   Saddam Hussein


TONY BLAIR - This ex barrister, husband to Cherie Booth, led the UK to war with Iraq on (effectively) solicited intelligence. Arnie looks on as Blair laughs. Killing thousands of innocent civilians to secure cheap oil is no laughing matter. Many people believe that Blair is a war criminal and should stand trial. Saddam Hussein was murdered by soldiers and his country raped - on the basis that he was making weapons of mass destruction. No weapons of mass destruction existed. It is alleged that faulty (or fabricated) UK intelligence had been used as an excuse to topple the dictator in pursuit of an energy related agenda. This must have put the fear of God into other Middle Eastern rulers who should take heed of British Injustices - possibly another string to our politicians' cheap energy agenda. Yes, indeed, but such betrayals of trust are also a major blow for world peace.



Vicarage Lane, Hailsham, East Sussex, BN27 2AX T: 01323 443322
Pine Grove, Crowborough, East Sussex, TN6 1DH T: 01892 653311


    Great British Injustices








This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


This site is protected under Article10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.