UNIVERSAL DECLARATION 

OF HUMAN RIGHTS

HOME  |   CASE STUDIES   |   HISTORY  |   LAW   |    POLITICS    |    RIGHTS   |   SITE INDEX

Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948

Article 12.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

 

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION  OF HUMAN RIGHTS

 

Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5

Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 Article 10

Article 11 Article 12 Article 13 Article 14 Article 15

Article 16 Article 17 Article 18 Article 19 Article 20

Article 21 Article 22 Article 23 Article 24 Article 25

Article 26 Article 27 Article 28 Article 29 Article 30

 

 

EUROPEAN CONVENTION  OF HUMAN RIGHTS

 

Article 1 Article 2 Article 3

Article 4 Article 5 Article 6

Article 7 Article 8 Article 9

Article 10 Article 11 Article 12

Article 13 Article 14 Article 15

Article 16 Article 17 Article 18

 

 

 

 



 

 

LEAD CASE: DISCRIMINATION & EFFECTIVE REMEDY - In the case of Nelson Kruschandl v Sussex Police and Wealden District Council, The British Governments of the United Kingdom has/have been in violation of several of the above articles since 1982, with another milestone passed in 1987 and a further major obstacle to personal development and potential in 2008 with the employment of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Since that time Articles 1 and 8 of the UN Universal Declaration have been violated in that in Britain Article 13 of European Convention has been deliberately omitted from the Human Rights Act 1998 - for the express purpose of undermining, holding back and preventing the personal development potential of certain citizens who challenge the present system whereby the ordinary man is a slave to financial institutions, the landed gentry and the councils, courts and reviewers who serve them in a modern Britain with lesser overtly exploitive opportunities than their Empire days.

 

In furtherance of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth Windsor's Government' objectives, Legal Aid funding to be able to mount any kind of fully argued trial defence or appeal against wrongful conviction, has been trimmed to the bone - such as to have the appearance of a functional justice system - but that in fact the British justice system is fatally flawed on several counts. 

 

 

(other language versions)

The Human Rights Act 1998  -  Schedule 1 Part I - The Articles  -  Part II  First Protocol  -  Part III Sixth Protocol

Scotland Legislation |  Wales Legislation |  Northern Ireland Legislation |  HMSO