BUNNY BOILERS - WARREN BLACKWELL

  Bunny boilers are extremely dangerous now that no proof is needed to obtain a conviction is sex cases - Chris Grayling justice minister will be asked to review Sexual Offences Act presumption of guilt, which breaches Article 6 right to a fair hearing

HOME     |   CASE STUDIES   |   LAW   |    POLITICS   |   SCANDAL  |     SITE INDEX   |    WHISTLEBLOWING

 


 

SEX ATTACK LIAR NAMED BY PEER  - 19th October 2006 by SAM GREENHILL

 

A woman with a long history of crying rape who sent an innocent man to jail was named in Parliament amid calls for a change in the law.

 

Shannon Taylor was unmasked by a peer who told the House of Lords her lies had put father-of-two Warren Blackwell behind bars for more than three years.

 

 

Lord Campbell-Savours

 

Lord Campbell-Savours

 

 

Lord Campbell-Savours used Parliamentary privilege to expose her identity and lambast the 'shabby' police investigation that saw Mr Blackwell imprisoned.

 

Legal experts praised his decision to speak out to prevent other men falling victim to fake sex attack allegations.

 

Mr Blackwell, 36, whose loyal wife Tanya never doubted his innocence, was dramatically cleared at the Appeal Court last month after Miss Taylor's background as a serial fantasist was exposed by a Criminal Cases Review Commission investigation.

 

But although his name was blackened, anonymity laws meant his accuser's was automatically protected, and she became known only as Miss A.

 

Even the appeal judges wanted to name her - but were powerless to do so - to warn other blameless members of the public.

 

The Daily Mail led calls for her identity to be revealed before she put another innocent man through torment.

 

Yesterday, Lord Campbell-Savours - said to be motivated by 'outrage' at the case - stood up and publicly did so.

 

He asked fellow peers: "Is not the inevitable consequence of the workings of the law, as currently framed, that we will carry on imprisoning innocent people like Warren Blackwell, who was falsely accused by a serial and repeated liar, Shannon Taylor, with a history of false accusations and multiple identities?

 

"As a result of her accusations, he spent three and a half years in prison following a shabby and inadequate police investigation, and was only exonerated when the Criminal Cases Review Commission inquiry cleared him and exposed her history."

 

The Labour peer added: "Shouldn't mature accusers who perjure themselves in rape trials be named and prosecuted for perjury?"

 

Miss Taylor's own daughter backed the decision to disclose her name, saying: "She is a danger and the public needs to be warned. She needs prosecuting for what she did. She is every man's worst nightmare."

 

Mr Blackwell's ordeal began when his accuser, now 38, claimed she had been seized with a knife outside a village club early on New Year's Day 1999, taken to an alley and indecently assaulted.

 

She later picked him out of an identity parade and a jury found him guilty, even though there was no forensic evidence against him and he had no previous convictions.

 

Eventually, the case was investigated by the Criminal Cases Review Commission which found that the woman had made up at least seven other fake allegations of sexual and physical assault, including against her own father. She frequently changed her name and police forces did not realise they were dealing with the same woman.

 

Her own mother has described her as "a persistent liar, very manipulative and a bully" who frequently claimed to have been beaten, sexually attacked and raped - all of which were untrue. She has a history of mental illness and self-harm.

 

The original investigation by Northamptonshire Police was exposed as shoddy, with Mr Blackwell's lawyers claiming that normal safeguards and procedures were completely ignored. He plans to sue.

 

Yesterday, a friend of 63-year-old Lord Campbell-Savours explained why he decided to speak out. He said: "He named her because he was outraged. He doesn't think it's got anything to do with the issue of rape, he thinks it's an issue of perjury.

 

"This woman made up the story and told lies and he can't see why a person who has perjured themselves should be protected, irrespective of the type of offence.

 

"Sometimes people have to stick their heads above the parapet in cases where the law is clearly an ass and needs to be reformed.

 

"He thinks the law around anonymity, particularly where false accusations have been made, needs to be changed."

 

Welcoming the development, Mr Blackwell, from Woodford Halse, Northamptonshire, said: "It's absolutely fantastic. I didn't think anybody would have the guts to name her.

 

"This woman needs to be stopped. The fact is, she remains free to carry on crying rape and up till now has been enjoying the full protection of the law. It's absolutely crazy that she could not be named and shamed, because innocent men need to be warned to avoid her like the plague.

 

"Now I hope she will go on to be prosecuted." But she is unlikely to face charges for perjury or perverting justice.

 

Northamptonshire Police yesterday claimed there was "insufficient evidence", while Crown Prosecution sources have cited her mental illness as a barrier.

 

But Mr Blackwell's barrister Anne Johnson said: "There is a clear public interest in her being prosecuted for perjury or the very least wasting police time.

 

"It's fantastic that somebody of authority has finally come out and named this woman. The issue needs to be aired otherwise nothing will be done."

 

At Mr Blackwell's appeal last month, Mr Justice Tugendhat admitted that similar tragic cases could follow because of the lies of the 'Miss A', adding that Parliament had not seemed to have considered this possibility when framing the law. Last night the judge said he did not wish to comment on yesterday's twist.

 

In the 1970s, the Daily Mail campaigned for women in sex cases to be granted automatic anonymity, to protect genuine victims of genuine crimes.  Although Miss Taylor has now been publicly named, there is nothing to stop her changing her identity yet again.

 

Callers to her most recent address were told by her boyfriend that she no longer lived there.

 

 

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below?

 

It is unfortunate that in my opinion women seem to be able to make allegations and men are treated as guilty unless proven innocent. This spills over into family law where this happens all the time. It is time for laws to be changed and the system to be exposed for what it is. I take my hat of to the judge for naming this women. It is about time that more professional people i.e. judges and lawyers started looking at what is right and wrong instead of either following there own political agenda or lining their own pockets.



- Lisa Lipscombe, Burlington, Canada

 

The sentencing for false accusations of rape should be as harsh, and enforced as harshly, as rape itself.



The USA also needs to wake up to the many false allegations of rape that are putting innocent men in jail.



- Denis, Boston, MA USA

 

 

 

Warren Blackwell and wife Tanya - Guilty until Proven Innocent

 

Warren Blackwell and wife Tanya - Guilty until Proven Innocent

 

 

Man freed but serial rape accuser remains anonymous -12th September 2006

 

Warren Blackwell and his wife Tanya outside the Court of Appeal

 

An innocent man jailed for a sex attack was dramatically cleared after it emerged that his 'victim' is a serial liar with a long history of crying rape.

 

But because of laws that protect her anonymity, judges are powerless to name and shame her, leaving her free to make more false accusations against blameless members of the public.

 

Mr Blackwell, 36, hugged his loyal wife Tanya and wept as the Appeal Court quashed his conviction.

 

He described his accuser as "every man's worst nightmare".

 

Mr Justice Tugendhat admitted, however, that similar tragic cases could follow because of the lies of the woman, Miss A.

 

"Parliament does not seem to have contemplated this situation.

 

"There appears to be no means of displacing her entitlement to anonymity."

 

In the 1970s, the Daily Mail campaigned for women in sex cases to be granted automatic anonymity, but now there are questions about whether the law has gone too far.

 

Warren Blackwell's nightmare began when Miss A, now 38, claimed she had been seized with a knife outside a village club early on New Year's Day 1999, taken to an alley and indecently assaulted.

 

She later picked Mr Blackwell out at an identity parade.

 

There was no forensic evidence against him and he had no previous convictions.

 

 

'She needs to be stopped'

 

Yet Mr Blackwell, from Woodford Halse, Northamptonshire, was found guilty and spent three years and four months behind bars.

 

Eventually the case was referred to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) which assigned Detective Chief Inspector Steve Glover, to investigate. He discovered that the woman:
Has made at least five other fake allegations of sexual and physical assault to police in three separate forces.
Was married twice and made false allegations against both husbands - one of whom was a policeman.
Once accused her own father of sexual assault, but police concluded she had made it up.
Accused a boy of rape when she was a teenager, only for a doctor to discover she was still a virgin.
The CCRC concluded that in the case of Mr Blackwell, she had "lied about the assault and was not attacked at all, her injuries being self-inflicted".

 

 

The Crown Prosecution Service did not oppose the appeal.

 

David Farrell QC, for the Crown, said: "This conviction is unsafe. What has come out of the woodwork paints a picture of a woman with immense personal problems with serious difficulties in distinguishing between truth and lies."

 

If this information had been known at the time of the trial, he added, "this case would not have made it off the ground".

 

Mr Blackwell said: "Clearly something has to be done about this woman. She needs to be stopped. The prosecution say she is psychiatrically disturbed, but insane people who murder are tried and if found guilty put away."

 

Mr Blackwell, who plans to sue police over his ordeal, will now have his name removed from the Sex Offender Register.

 

His accuser has a history of mental illness and self-harm - once inscribing the word 'HATE' on her body with scissors.

 

However, because she has changed her name at least eight times, and moved between addresses in at least three counties, it seems police never realised they were dealing with the same woman.

 

For Mr Blackwell, her accusations meant he missed more than three years of family life. His son Liam, ten, and stepdaughter Holly, 16, were three and nine when his ordeal began.

 

His 36-year-old wife said: "I never doubted him for a second. We were together six years before it happened, and ever since."

 

By SAM GREENHILL

 

 

Add your comment | View all Comments (48)

48 people have commented on this story so far. Tell the Mail on Sunday what you think using the links above.

 

I think that most right-thinking people would support a change to allow these people to be identified. It might even have some deterrent effect.
- Gordon Littlewood, Valenciennes, France

 

When you name the accused guilty or not you should also name the accuser. If his photo is published then so should hers be. Let's have things equal and fair all round.
- Mike, Wadebridge, UK.

 

This government does not have the time to waste on changing this law they are all too busy jostling for the top office job.
- Gordon Myatt, Swansea UK

 

 

Rules of Engagement, call off an engagement if you dare, you'll go to prison

 

 

 

Gordon Staker works for the Child Protection Unit in Eastbourne, East Sussex. He is involved in the so-called Herstmonceux Bunny Boiler case heard in February 2008. We are closely following this case for any developments and other similar cases. Any member of the public targeted by a Child Protection Unit, would do well to note the case management tactics employed by Henrietta Pagett, where it is usual for the CPS to prosecute persons with an unrelated criminal record. This is because those unfortunates will be advised not to disclose their history, so as not to put this before a Jury. Should you be advised to go this route, you will not be able to call your accuser or any of the Crown's witnesses liars, even when they are not telling the truth. Additionally, you will not be able to call character witnesses. Hence, you will be fighting a case with one hand behind your back, heavily outnumbered by the volume of witnesses the Crown will call. Food for thought!

 

Many of our readers will know that hundreds of men each year (many teachers) suffer accusations from girls with a grudge, many of which turn out to be false and revenge motivated.

 

 

SUSSEX POLICE

 

Many policemen are Masons.  This can lead to corruption at high levels, where fellow Masons, members of the public, might obtain favours, charges dropped, or charges brought against someone, as examples.  The law is quite often used incorrectly (illegally) to further the objectives of private causes. But who is there to investigate? Since many, if not most high ranking officers are Masons, in whichever force, even an outside force is unlikely to identify an officer who will make any effort to investigate a fellow officer.  It's a club, for a favoured few.

 

A - Z of Sussex officer investigations

 

Joe Edwards

Ken Jones

Paul Whitehouse

Sarah Jane Gallagher

Sir Ken Macdonald QC

 

The above is just a few of a number of persons likely to be investigated in respect of certain cases brought against Wealden Action Group members, on the instigation of known Masons, councillors, or planning officers, many of which are themselves Masons.

 

 

 

 

PORRIDGE - YOUTUBE

 

 

 

FAIR USE NOTICE

 

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

 

This site is protected under Article10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.