relying upon anything attributed to VOMIT please check with us for
accuracy. Our Web page was sabotaged by people who put cash before
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications or in VOMIT web
pages has an absolute right of reply. JMF stands for the Judaeo/Masonic
Faction which is similar to the former P2 lodge in Italy. The ordinary
Mason and Jew are just as likely to suffer from the machinations of the
JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are. Most institutions in the UK are
Everything we publish is aimed at the detection, exposure and prevention
of crime especially in the public sector. We act in the public interest.
This document is not an unsolicited offer of goods or services. Any
individual not in the public service will have his or her name deleted
from our circulation list on request. Don't let us waste your time.
ALMOs: Arms Length Management Organisations are invariably formed to
conceal corruption between the responsible authorities and their friends
the commercial world.
OSTRICHES: are authorities responsible for fair dealing who sever
connections with complainers when they run out of excuses for condoning
unfair dealing and serious corruption
QUANGOS: are Quasi Autonomous Non Government Organisations which are
supposed to look after the interests of the ordinary members of the
Invariably they do exactly the opposite. Where pricing is involved they
effectively create a cartel which ensures that there is no competition.
They are festooned with overpaid parasites whose main strength is their
ability to lie, lie and lie again.
GCP: God's Chosen People or God's Chosen Person
note: Not all masons are bad news - many initiates have no idea or
disapprove of the self-seeking criminality and persecution that goes
on, mostly at the higher levels
Tony Gosling @nticopyright
I first heard about the Freemasons they seemed harmless enough, a likable
curiosity. Aprons? Secret handshakes? A bit of childlike escapism for
grown-ups? But Stephen Knight and Martin Short's masonic exposés reveal
an occult order where standards are falling rapidly. Their investigations
reveal a more sinister picture of the world's most extensive secret
an individual level privacy is an essential right, but the characteristics
of freemasonry make it inappropriate in many cases. Britain's 700,000
masons, that's about one in thirty adult men, form a secret link between
the country's most powerful institutions. Secret masonic links can be used
by unscrupulous businessmen and other individuals to compromise the
independence and integrity of the media, judiciary, local government,
lawyers, MP's, local councillors, royalty, politicians, armed forces,
police, civil servants, and intelligence agencies. And, in the 1990's, as
economic pressures increase, so does the temptation to abuse the masonic
network for private gain. A complete national list of initiates is the
very least the public require if masonic assisted corruption in positions
of public trust is to be checked out, and ruled out.
initiation rites, occultism, secret expressions, closed meetings... and
all for what?
recruits are drummed up by existing masons '...it might be a good idea to
join...' but the choice of whether to actually apply or not is up to the
individual. So what does that decision say about a person? Anyone
who approaches the masons in order to join will probably be encouraged by
the prospect of gaining social positions by the back door. In other words
the initiate has the fundamental ingredient of a cheat who is prepared to
go behind the public's back because he lacks confidence, self-belief or
integrity. Masons are men who fight shy of free and open discussion. The
usual reason for men joining is to take up the masons' unofficial promise
to further one's career.
why aren't these powerful people coming clean?
the lowest three degrees of masonry there is a plethora of silly rituals
that may, or may not, mean something. The point of these is surely to
brainwash men into accepting bizarre subservience without questioning why
they are doing it. If initiates prove to be truly and ingratiatingly
obedient they are then selected by their Masonic betters to enter the
higher degrees up to level 33 [see extract below]. The move to these
higher degrees is like stepping from the second class to the first class
carriage on a train. The 4th to 33rd degree seems to be called the
'Royal Arch' though I can find no masonic literature 'spelling that out'.
Royal Arch is more like a gentleman's club than the lower levels. In
Britain the H.Q. of the Royal Arch 'The Supreme Council' is at 10 Duke
Street, St. James's London SW1. Check out the brass plaque by the door,
'The Supreme Council, Ring Once'
notable and easily missed Masonic venue is no. 86 St. James' Street in
London SW1. The Mark Masons HQ or the 'Worshipful Society of Free Masons'
is just a stone's throw from the royal hangout of St. James' Palace.
At the front of the masonic building is an office of Kall-Kwik
secrecy is at the very heart of what the masons are about. Masonry is for
those who'd never be able to get what they want by open discussion. Masons
celebrate the ignorance in others and as such keep progress of human
understanding. Masons are going behind people's backs with their
patronising, condescending and subversive brotherhood.
Grand Master (33rd degree) Mason is Prince Michael of Kent. His
father the then Duke of Kent, was a Nazi supporter in World War 2. Hardly
is bad for the families of those who join it, because it can, and
frequently does, take precedence over everything else in their lives. It
is bad for culture, democracy and the nation. The fact that so many of our
so called public 'servants' are secretly masons subverts the crucial
principle of open government. As one of Stephen Knight's anonymous
ex-masons attests [see below], 'There is no defence against an evil which
only the victims and the perpetrators know exists.'
attempt to expose precise details of all the cranky rituals performed in
the lodge is time consuming and surely misses the point. The message is
already clear... powerful people are putting time in behind closed doors
for their clique's advantage, and therefore our decline.
shalt not suffer a witch to live. Exodus 22;18
Victims Of Masonic Ill Treatment
VOMIT newssheet comes out weekly. It is vitriolic and has short ascerbic
articles purporting to expose corruption caused by the 'JMF', which
it describes as:
Judeao Masonic Faction; the heirarchies of Jews and Masons, the
Establishment, the Old Boy Network or whatever you want to call it. It
is the thing which controls our lives and contaminates the Judiciary and
the Executive. It is the thing which makes a mockery of human rights and
can be obtained from JM Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road,
Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4RU.
Enquiries and editorial phone/fax number 01494 871204
resources on the internet:
and uk.legal for the latest
edition - go to Metacrawler
or Altavista and search usenet
drop down box for "victims of masonic ill treatment" or just
from VOMIT 12/98 'Calling All Victims'
dated 16 April 1998 from Mr J S Chalmers, Field End, 51 Conway Crescent,
Burnham-on-Sea,Somerset TA8 2UW (Telephone 01278 794374) to J M Todd
As a fellow Mason I should address you as Brother but I am so appalled by
a letter which you wrote recently to the press I feel disinclined to do
so. I find it unbelievable to say 'I do not know a single Mason who has
not been prepared to accept preferential treatment derived from Masonic
Membership'. The principles of the Craft that I certainly uphold, clearly
forbid any 'preferential treatment' and I for one never gained any such
advantage from my membership of 25 years. The impression you give to the
public at large is a disgrace to Freemasonry and quite shameful to make
such a statement. You are fully aware that there is a National Register of
members and like any other Association this is mainly kept private. How
can you remain a member if you truly believe what you have said?
There will always be 'black sheep' in any organisation but you malign many
thousands of decent men in the craft by your sweeping statement. I have
always lived up to the code of conduct contained in our ritual and true
friendship in the Brotherhood of Masonry can only exist if it is untainted
by such hypocrisy. I trust many others will point out the error of your
Signed J S Chalmers W Bro. J. S. CHALMERS. P. PRO. G. SUPT. OF WORKS (West
dated 18 April 1998 from J M Todd.
Dear Mr Chalmers,
I thank you for your letter of 16 April 1998 referring to my letter of 21
February published by the Times. One thousand salutations to you and ten
Brownie points and may the Great Architect of the Universe watch over you.
It was not my intention to offend decent Masons but rather to waken them
up to the reality of Freemasonry. For my first twenty years of Masonic
subservience my attitude was exactly like yours. I may still be a member
because in Scotland one is automatically a life member in order to
maintain a maximum number of brainwashed slaves to the cause.
My view is that Masons in high places are black sheep and that the rest
are white sheep. Since it is obvious that you are one of the lower order
Masons who do not know the first thing about Masonic corruption I should
not abuse you. Bear in mind that many of us Masons have suffered
grievously and still suffer as the result a Masonic chicanery. We don't
take too kindly to people like you who are worried about the impression we
give to 'people at large'. People at large are sick of the manner in which
your hierarchy has undermined every institution in the land.
You would not know if you had gained advantages through the Craft. You
could have been given promotion because, as a Mason, you would trust the
word of a bent Mason. However, if you care to think a bit more you will
realise that not only have you derived unfair advantage by being a Mason
you will also have bestowed the same unfair advantage on other Masons.
If you want to reply to this letter please do so by return. I will publish
Yours fraternally and eternally,
James M Todd -o-o-o-
IAN OLIVER - GRAMPIANS CHIEF CONSTABLE [this para deleted for legal
reasons see - Tony]
from VOMIT 8/98 'The Masonic Crooks'
Royal Masonic Hospital See Private Eye of 20 February 1998 at
page 9. The RMH had an excellent reputation for not killing its Masonic
patients. It was financed and effectively owned by the lodges who had
funded it for years. The ordinary decent Mason had paid the piper. The
Grand Lodge had no say in the ownership and administration. This did not
stop the Grand Lodge in the form the president of the governors, the Duke
of Kent who was and is also the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of
England, deciding to sell the hospital. The governors took successful
action in the courts. For reasons unknown the hospital went into
receivership. The lodges offered to put up £12 million to keep it afloat.
The Official Receiver and the Charity Commissioners turned down the offer
authorised its sale to a property developers for £6 million. The property
developer has already sold part of the property for £16.8 million and
still has a few acres left for development. The developer will have no
problem obtaining planning permission and making a further gain that could
exceed the profit already made.
Will you ordinary Masons please read our introduction again?
Note that the Charity Commissioners and the Official Receiver approved of
the sale. We found the Charity Commissioners guilty of the same offences
when they allowed Barclays Bank Trust Company to defraud the Combined
Charities Trust in the sale of the official cocaine distribution centre
next door. The Official Receiver has been guilty of serious offences in
the Winding Up of Bydand Limited (the highest bidder for what became the
cocaine distribution centre). We have tried to provide the Metropolitan
Commissioner with information that could lead to the discovery of other
locations connected with the cocaine trade but so far there has been no
response. In due course we hope to show that the drugs business helped to
finance Lloyds Insurance Syndicates.
Knight's book: 'The Brotherhood'
only five per cent of Freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or
corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer
to twelve or thirteen per cent now."
am free to name only a small number of the many hundreds of people who
have helped me with advice and information. Most of those who helped did
so only on the understanding that I would say nothing that could lead to
their identification. Among these were many Freemasons who feared
recrimination from other members of the Brotherhood. Others included
government officials, politicians, judges, policemen of all ranks,
lawyers, churchmen, past and present officers of MI5 and MI6, and people
from every sector of society touched on in the book.
Knights Templar, p.168
England, the rank of barrister-at-law is conferred exclusively by four
unincorporated bodies in London, known collectively as the Honourable
Societies of the Inns of Court. The four Inns, established between 1310
and 1357, are Lincoln's Inn, Gray's Inn, the Middle Temple and the Inner
Temple. Prior to the establishment of the latter two Inns, the Temple,
which lies between Fleet Street and the River Thames, was the headquarters
of the Knights Templar, declared heretics by King Philip IV of France and
wiped out during the early fourteenth century. There is a modern day Order
of Knights Templar within British Freemasonry which claims direct descent
from the medieval order. From the beginning the men of law were linked
money "Through the organisation", p.204/5
now dead, was a corrupt man who used the Lodge at Wandsworth unashamedly
for setting up crooked deals. Among seven charges of corruption for which
he was later jailed for six years, Sporle was found guilty of taking a job
from T. Dan Smith, PR man and fellow conspirator of architect John Poulson.
It is generally thought that Smith, who did so much to further the
interests of Poulson (himself known to have exploited his masonic
membership at every opportunity), was also a member of the Brotherhood.
According to what he told me, and I have no reason to disbelieve him, he
is not and never has been a Freemason, however. This is what he said when
we met for a cup of tea at the Charing Cross Hotel: 'People have always
assumed that I am a Mason, so gradually I found the way they shook hands
and the way they made the next move - and because I virtually detested
them (for no reason other than I hate that sort of organization) I always
used to give them the handshake back. Still do. I met a journalist last
week from the Daily Mirror. He gave me a Freemasonic handshake and
I gave him one, and he said, "Oh, you're on the Square." He
said, "As you're on the Square, why didn't you pass the money to Ted
Short that way.
'I said, "Well, how do you do it that way?" He said, "Very
simply. You just pass it through the organization."'
Edward Short, MP for Newcastle Central, was an old friend of Smith's and a
Freemason. He accepted £500.00 from Smith 'for the work you have done on
behalf of the firm'. The DPP later considered prosecuting Short for
accepting a bribe but decided there was no case to answer. Eleven years
after the event, when it all came out, Short, by then deputy Prime
Minister and Leader of the House, astonished Parliament by not resigning
despite dissatisfaction with his explanation.
There are clues that there is a well-established system within Freemasonry
for passing money untraceably from one Mason to another. No fewer than
seven informants within the brotherhood as well as T. Dan Smith on the
outside have told me of the system.
the ritual of exaltation, the name of the Great Architect of the Universe
[The Freemason's god] is revealed as JAH-BUL-ON - not a general umbrella
term but a precise designation that describes a specific supernatural
being - a compound deity composed of three separate personalities fused in
one. Each syllable of the 'ineffable name' represents one personality of
- Jahweh, The God of the Hebrews.
- Baal, the ancient Canaanite fertility god associated with 'licentious
rites of imitative magic'.
- Osiris, the Ancient Egyptian god of the underworld.
of course, was the 'false god' with whom Jahweh competed for the
allegiance of the Isrealites in the Old Testament. But more recently,
within a hundred years of the creation of the Freemason's god, the
sixteenth century demonologist John Weir identified Baal as a devil. This
grotesque manifestation of evil had the body of a spider and three heads -
those of a man, a toad, and a cat. A description of Baal to be found in de
Plancy's Dictionary of Witchcraft is particularly apposite when considered
in the light of the secretive and deceptive nature of Freemasonry: his
voice was raucous, and he taught his followers guile, cunning and the
ability to become invisible.
from Chapter 5
is an Elite group of Freemasons in England over whom the United Grand
Lodge has no jurisdiction. These are the brethren of the so-called Higher
Degrees, and even the majority of Freemasons have no idea of their
Most Freemasons who have been raised to the 3rd Degree to become Master
Masons believe they are at the top of the masonic ladder. As novices they
were Entered Apprentices. They were then 'passed' as Fellow Craft Masons
and finally 'raised' as Masters. The very name Master has connotations of
supremity. If Master Masons have ambition it will usually be to achieve
office within their Lodge - eventually, with good fortune and the passing
of years, to become Worshipful Master of their mother Lodge (the Lodge to
which they were first initiated into Masonry). Those who have their eyes
fixed on higher office will aim for rank in their Provincial Grand Lodge
or in the United Grand Lodge itself. But even the Grand Master of all
England is only a Freemason of the 3rd Degree. The three Craft degrees
form the entire picture of Masonry for most of the 600,000 'uninitiated
initiates' of the Brotherhood in England and Wales.
2º Fellow Craft
1º Entered Apprentice
'Masters', who form the largest proportion of Freemasons, are in most
cases quite unaware of the thirty superior degrees to which they will
never he admitted, nor even hear mentioned. This is the real picture, with
the three lowly degrees governed by Grand Lodge and the thirty higher
degrees governed by a Supreme Council.
These thirty degrees, beginning with the 4th (that of Secret Master) and
culminating in the 33rd (Grand Inspector General), are controlled by a
Supreme Council whose headquarters are at 10 Duke Street, St James's
London SWI. Nobody walking down Duke Street from Piccadilly is likely to
suspect the true nature of what goes on inside the building, even if he or
she happens to notice the small plate to the right of the entrance which
says, 'The Supreme Council. Ring once'. Built in 1910-11, this imposing
Edwardian mansion with fine neo-classical features might easily be taken
for a consulate or the headquarters of some private institute. Nor do
people thumbing through the S-Z section of the London Telephone Directory
get any clue from the entry sandwiched between Supreme Cleaners and
Supreme Die Cutter 'Supreme Council 33rd Degree ... 01-930 1606'.
Nobody looking at that fine but anonymous house from outside could suspect
that behind its pleasing facade, beyond the two sets of sturdy double
doors and up the stairs there is a Black Room, a Red Room and a Chamber of
Death.. To high Masons, the house in Duke Street known as the Grand East.
Members of Craft Freemasonry - that is, all but a few thousand of
England's Masons - often argue that Freemasonry is not a secret society
but a society with secrets. Although the argument is in the end
unconvincing, it has its merits. But no such case can be made out for the
wealthy society-within-a-society based at 10 Duke Street.
Thirty-three Degrees of Freemasonry
33º Grand Inspector General
32º Sublime Prince of the Royal Secret
31º Grand Inspector Inquisitor Commander
30º Grand Elected Knight Kadosh, Knight of the Black and White Eagle
29º Knight of St Andrew
28º Knight of the Sun
27º Commander of the Temple
26º Prince of Mercy
25º Knight of the Brazen Serpent
24º Prince of the Tabernacle
23º Chief of the Tabernacle
22º Prince of Libanus
21º Patriarch Noachite
20º Venerable Grand Master
19º Grand Pontiff
18º Knight of the Pelican and Eagle and Sovereign Prince Rose Croix of
17º Knight of the East and West
16º Prince of Jerusalem
15º Knight of the Sword, or of the East
14º Scottish Knight of Perfection
13º Royal Arch (of Enoch)
12º Grand Master Architect
11º Sublime Elect
10º Elect of Fifteen
9º Elect of Nine
8º Intendant of the Building
7º Provost and Judge
6º Intimate Secretary
5º Perfect Master
4º Secret Master
3º Master Mason
2º Fellow Craft
1º Entered Apprentice
There is no Degree higher then that of Master Mason.. Once a MM a man can
go on to join the Appendant Bodies like York Rite & Scottish Rite that
have higher number Degrees but none has a higher position then the Third
Degree of the Blue Lodge. from Manny at MasonTruth@aol.com]
of the regulations of ordinary Craft Freemasonry is that no Mason may
invite an outsider to join. Anyone wishing to become a Freemason must take
the initiative and seek two sponsors from within the Brotherhood [This, at
least, is the theory - and United Grand Lodge staunchly maintains that it
is the practice. In reality most Entered Apprentices are recruited by
existing Masons they know personally]. The position is reversed for
Freemasons of the 3rd Degree who wish to be elevated to the Higher
Degrees. Initiation open only to those Master Masons who are selected by
the Supreme Council. If a representative of the Supreme Council
establishes a contact with a Master Mason and concludes that he is
suitable, the Candidate will be offered the chance of being 'perfected'
and setting the first foot the ladder to the 33rd Degree. But only a small
proportion even of the limited number of Freemasons who take first step,
progress beyond the 18th Degree, that of Knight of the Pelican and Eagle
and Sovereign Prince Rose Croix of Heredom. With each Degree, the number
of initiates diminishes. The 31st Degree (Grand Inspector Inquisitor
Commander) is restricted to 400 members; the 32nd (Sublime Prince of the
Royal Secret) to 180; and the 33rd - the pre-eminent Grand Inspectors
General - to only 75 members.
of my major sources of information was a former Grand Inspector Inquisitor
Commander of the Thirty-First Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Rite who
had withdrawn from Masonry in 1968 for religious reasons. As with so many
other people in the labyrinthine world of Freemasonry, I was led to him by
way of a series of contacts, He agreed through a third party to he
interviewed by me concerning his conviction that no active Christian could
in all conscience remain a Freemason.
When I met him I learned that he was a judge, and a particularly
quick-tempered one. Although I had heard of him, I had hitherto known
little about him.
We spent a long time talking about Masonry and religion, but after a while
I began to ask him about the Ancient and Accepted Rite of the Thirty-Third
Degree. He was, after all, only the fourth initiate to the Rite who had
agreed to see me. He answered quickly. 'No, I dare not go into that,' he
said. 'We'd better stick with religion.' It seemed a perfectly normal
answer - I had received many such replies over the months of my
investigation. It sounded like the usual rebuff. But I thought immediately
afterwards how strange it was that he had used the words 'dare not'. Most
people said, 'I'd better not', or 'I'd rather not'. I remarked on his use
of the word. He said, Anyone in public life has to be cautious.'
'Cautious,' I repeated. 'That's a masonic word of recognition.'
'You've obviously delved into the ritual, so you know,' he said. 'But I
mean cautious in the sense everybody understands it.'
'What must you be cautious about?'
'Mr Knight, I don't like this line of questioning. I agreed to speak to
you in general terms about why my commitment to Jesus is incompatible with
the masonic religion. I do not wish to be drawn into discussion of matters
covered by whatever undertakings I have ... taken.'
'By undertakings, do you mean masonic oaths?'
He paused. 'Yes, I do. I prefer the word obligation to oath. It's not the
I remember thinking as I turned the conversation back on to the track I
wanted it to follow that it would be interesting later on to return to
this question of the distinction between an obligation and an oath. I
'Why do you have to be cautious, careful', I said. 'You're not a Mason any
more. I've got copies of all the rituals of the 4th to 33rd degree. There
is no obligation which could possibly be interpreted to forbid you from
telling me what you meant when you used the word "dare" in an
This isn't about my religious convictions, is it?'
'Many of your former masonic colleagues are very powerful people in this
country. Do you think there would be some kind of reprisal if you gave
away any secrets?'
'Not of the kind you write about in your book about Jack the Ripper.' He
laughed. A bit hollowly, I thought.
'Well, not murder, no, I wouldn't have thought so.' I, too, laughed. I
felt oddly embarrassed. 'But there is some kind of reprisal to be feared
then? Something more ... subtle?'
He began to look angry. He had made a slip. 'That was a figure of sp-- I
was making a joke. A very bad joke.'
'But you said-'
'I know, I know! And I do not believe for one moment that what you suggest
in your book has happened in real life - then or ever.'
I could see the rattled ex-Mason automatically slipping back into the
practice of a lifetime. Sometimes you shall divert a discourse, and manage
it prudently for the honour of the worshipful fraternity. I would not be
diverted into defending the evidence and arguments in my first book. I
felt I was close to something. I pressed on.
'Leaving murder aside, can I ask you . . .' And then it hit me. 'Can I ask
you, as a Christian, have you ever seen at first hand any sort of
reprisals carried out by Freemasons using masonic influence against any
non-Freemason or anti-Freemason?'
All at once, he seemed to relax, or to somehow collapse into a smaller man
as he let all the anger go out of him. 'As a Christian . . .' He paused
thoughtfully, and I noticed how very many times he blinked his eyes during
this hiatus. I wondered at one point if he was praying for guidance. He
drew a long, slow, deep breath. 'As a Christian, I have to tell you that I
have never in my whole life witnessed or heard about a single act of
hostility by a Freemason or group of Freemasons that was sanctioned by
Grand Lodge or Supreme Council' He looked at me significantly as he laid
stress on that qualifying clause. 'There,' he said. 'I have said nothing
which betrays my obligations.'
'I have heard from quite a lot of contacts about organized action by
groups of Freemasons that have resulted in the financial or social ruin of
certain people,' I said.
So have I,' he said, still looking me straight in the eye as if telling me
this was important. 'So have I, Mr Knight.' 'Have you any direct knowledge
of such happenings?'
'Not of such happenings which had the backing of official Freemasonry.'
'But of action which was unofficial? In other words, Masons abusing the
Craft for their own ends?'
'You know the answer to that, from the way I have said what I have said.'
'I have also heard about people who have "crossed" certain
Masons and finished up in prison . ...'
He stopped me in mid-sentence by placing a finger on his lips.
'If I told you everything I know about Freemasonry being betrayed by its
members, it would surprise even you,' he said. 'It would make your hair
stand on end. I can't tell you any more.' Then, as if it was an
afterthought, but I don't believe it was, he said, 'Give me your phone
number. You might hear from someone in a few days.' I gave him the number.
'Who?' I said.
The finger went back to his lips and he went to fetch my coat.
'God bless,' he said as I left, and I ran pell-mell to a sandwich bar in
nearby Chancery Lane to scribble down the notes on which this account of
our meeting has been based.
Four days later I received a phone call from a man who told me he had seen
my advertisement for people with information about Freemasonry in an old
copy of the New Statesman (This advertisement had appeared for four weeks
in the summer of 1981, some nine months earlier). He said he had read my
Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution and would very much like to meet me. I
tried, as I tried with all my callers, to get him to say something
concrete on the phone, but he would not even tell me whether or not he was
a Mason. I had already received a dozen or so similar calls, some of which
had proved useful, some wild goose chases. But the researcher's world is
the natural habitat of wild geese and red herrings, and one accepts the
necessity of chasing them. Despite his unwillingness to talk - perhaps, in
a way, because of it - I arranged to meet him the following Saturday in
the vestibule of the Cafe Royal. From there we would go to his club. He
said his name was Christopher. Whether this was his Christian name or his
surname I didn't know.
When I arrived, he was sitting in the armchair to the right of the
fireplace, just inside the entrance, smoking a small cigar in a holder and
reading that day's Times. He was tall, more than six feet, slim and aged
about fifty. Everything about him spoke of affluence, except his plain
National Health Service glasses. We went to his club, which he pledged me
not to name as it could be used to identify him. It turned out that
Christopher was one of his three Christian names and that he was a very
senior Civil Servant in Whitehall. He had contacted me, he said, not as a
result of seeing the New Statesman advertisement - although he had seen it
when it appeared - but at the request of my cautious Christian Judge. He
asked me what I wanted to know. I said I took it that he was a Freemason.
He nodded and took some papers out of his slimline briefcase. He wanted me
to be in no doubt as to his bona fides.
After examining the papers I told him I was interested to know what a
person might have to fear from a group of influential Freemasons if
circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business
world; or if he discovered they were using Masonry for corrupt purposes;
or had fallen a victim of their misuse of Freemasonry and would not heed
warnings not to oppose them.
'It is not difficult to ruin a man,' he said. 'And I will tell you how it
is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under
the jurisdiction of Grand Lodge.
Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to
enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy
and power attract such people, and when they come the decent leave. The
numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in
the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of
Freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means
there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen
per cent now.'
It transpired that Christopher was one of a small and unpopular group
within Masonry who some time in the early seventies had decided that
either they had to get out of the Brotherhood or they had to do something
'to stop the rot' which the blinkered officers of Great Queen Street
refused to admit was there. His reason for talking to me was to assure me
that the Brotherhood was an essentially good body of men devoted to all
that was best in the British social system and which promoted brotherly
love and contributed to the wellbeing of the country and to the relief of
suffering. He wanted this put firmly across to the public, and his group
wanted pressure brought to bear on those in positions of responsibility
within the Brotherhood to put Freemasonry's house in order - to institute
proper policing, to close down Lodges used for shady dealings and to root
out corrupt brethren and expel them. The group - it had no name - also
wanted the whole business of masonic secrecy looked into by Grand Lodge,
most of them believing that secrecy was more harmful than helpful to
Christopher explained that Masonry's nationwide organization of men from
most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence
networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could
normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of masonic
contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers, Post Office
staff ('very useful in supplying copies of a man's mail'), doctors,
government employee bosses of firms and nationalized industries etc., etc.
dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When
the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability
would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he
has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have
proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his
past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily
obtainable through Freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish
on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the
wide-ranging masons network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were
disposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime
motive for joining. Even decent Masons could often be 'conned' into
providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help
the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a
fellow Mason to the Brother from whom information was sought perhaps
someone with access to his bank manager or employer. The 'good' Mason
would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemasons Hall whether or
not this was so. The 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a
fellow Mason, especially a fellow Lodge member, that would be enough for
any upright member of the Craft.
[I discovered from other sources that this system has been long
established within Masonry for the 'legitimate' purpose of bringing
succour to a distressed Brother Mason or to the family of a departed
Mason. It is common for details of a Freemason's debts, for instance, to
be passed to his Lodge by his masonic bank manager. This 'invasion of
privacy' is for no more sinister reason than for his brethren to club
together and pay off his debts. This occurs most often after the death of
a Mason, but by no means always. And this, apparently, is just one example
of the many methods by which Freemasons obtain information about each
other for genuine purposes.]
Sometimes this information gathering process - often involving a long
chain of masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would
be unnecessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to
initiate any desired action against him.
I asked how this 'action' might be taken.
'Solicitors are very good at it,' said Christopher. 'Get your man involved
in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him.'
Solicitors, I was told, are 'past masters' at causing endless delays,
generating useless paperwork, ignoring instructions, running up immense
bills, misleading clients into taking decisions damaging to themselves.
Masonic police can harass, arrest on false charges, and plant evidence. 'A
businessman in a small community or person in public office arrested for
dealing in child pornography, for indecent exposure, or for trafficking in
drugs is at the end of the line,' said Christopher. 'He will never work
again. Some people have committed suicide after experiences of that kind.'
Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks
withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my
informant. Bank can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their
work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local
authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and
extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge
repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - In reality cause -
further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard
to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties.
If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled Freemasons skilled in
using the 'network' it will be impossible because masonic Department of
Health and Social Security and Law Society officials (see pp 189-90) can
delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly.
'Employers, if they are Freemasons or not, can be given private
information about a man who has made himself an enemy of Masonry. At worst
he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed
over for promotion.'
Christopher added, 'Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason
doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two
occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to
ruin the chances of in individual getting a particular job which I know
about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.'
He continued for about half an hour to list examples of the ways in which
corrupt members of the Brotherhood could defeat opposition, repeating
every few minutes that these kinds of circumstances involved a minority of
the brethren and that most would be utterly appalled at even the
suggestion that such things were happening, let alone countenance them. '
That they were happening at all reflected the deterioration of the Craft
inasmuch as its entry requirements were no longer stringent enough. Those
in power in Freemasons Hall knew something of what went on, but they felt
defeated by it and preferred to look the other way rather than take steps
to eradicate it. If Christopher and his group failed to force the issue
into the open, he said, the organization would become so morally polluted
that it would simply cease to exist. But he was not solely concerned with
the Brotherhood. It was the victims of those who used Masonry as a source
of personal power who had to be helped as well.
'Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work
against them,' he told me. 'Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in
the end, though. It's . . . you see, I ... you finish up not knowing who
you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid
that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world
is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a
situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can
poison every part of a person's life. If they give in they go under. If
they don't give in It's only putting off the day because if they fight, so
much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will
likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of
desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they
look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them'.
'There is no defence against an evil which only the victims and the
perpetrators know exists.'
(from The Universal Book of Craft Masonry)
consists of a body of men banded together to preserve the secrets, customs
and ceremonials handed down to them, from time immemorial, and for the
purpose of mutual intellectual, social and moral improvement. They also
endeavour to cultivate and exhibit brotherly love, relief and truth, not
only to one another, but to the world at large.
Freemasonry offers no pecuniary advantages whatever, neither does there
exist any obligation nor implied understanding binding one Mason to deal
with another, nor to support him in any way in the ordinary business
relations of life.
Freemasonry teaches us to remember our common origin; it also distinctly
enjoins us to respect all social distinctions, so that while some must
rule, others must obey and cheerfully accept their inferior positions.
Freemasonry has certain charities, but it is not in any sense whatever a
benefit society, nor is it based on any calculations which would render
this possible. The charities are solely for those who having been in good
circumstances have been overtaken by misfortune or adversity, and they are
quite insufficient to meet even these demands now made upon them.
Freemasonry distinctly teaches that a man's first duty is to himself, his
wife, his family and his connections, and no one should join the Order who
cannot well afford to pay the initiation fees and subscriptions to his
Lodge as well as to the Masonic charities, and this without detriment in
any way to his comfort, or to that of those who have any claim upon his
Freemasonry recognises no distinctions of religion, but none should
attempt to enter who have no religious belief, as faith in a Deity must be
expressed before any can be initiated, and prayers to Him form a frequent
part of the ritual.
Freemasonry, therefore, demands that everyone, before offering himself as
a candidate, should be well assured in his own mind:
1. That he sincerely desires the intellectual and moral improvement of
himself and his fellow creatures, and that he is willing to devote part of
his time, means and efforts to the promotion of brotherly love, relief and
2. That he seeks no commercial, social nor pecuniary advantages.
3. That he is able to afford the necessary expenditure without injury to
himself or connections.
4. That he is willing to enter into solemn obligations in the sight of his
Officers of the Lodge
Lodge elects the following officers every year:
Worshipful Master Chairman of the Lodge.
Immediate Past Master Last year's Worshipful Master.
Senior Warden Personal officer of WM; next year's WM in most
Junior Warden Personal officer of WM and next in seniority.
Chaplain The officer who conducts prayers. Can be a man of any
profession in the outside world, not necessarily a clergyman.
Treasurer The senior officer in charge of the Lodge funds.
Director of Ceremonies In charge of the ritual element of Lodge
Senior Deacon The Deacons - with their wands - play an important
part in Lodge ritual, including acting the role of messengers.
Charity Steward. Officer in charge of the Lodge's donations to
Almoner Officer in charge of collecting and spending the Lodge's
Assistant Director of Ceremonies Self-explanatory.
Inner Guard Officer who guards the door of the Lodge on the inside
and ensures that only Freemasons enter.
Tyler The outer guard who stands outside the Lodge door with a
dagger as the first line of defence against non-Masons trying to enter.
Initiation to the First Degree up to the end of
Tyler prepares the Candidate in a room outside the Lodge room where he is
to be initiated by divesting him of all metal articles. The Candidate
removes his outer clothing until he stands ' in socks, his left shoe,
trousers and shirt only. His shirt is unbuttoned to reveal his left
breast, his right sleeve is rolled up to reveal the elbow, his left
trouser leg is rolled up above the knee and a slipper is placed on his
unshod foot. A hangman's noose is then placed around his neck, the end of
the rope hanging down behind him. He is blindfolded.
He is then led by the Tyler to the door of the Lodge and the Tyler knocks.
The Inner Guard, moving with the prescribed step and making the First
Degree sign, says, 'Brother junior Warden, there is a report.' After
several ritual responses, the Inner Guard opens the door and asks the
Tyler, 'Whom have you there?'
'Mr John Smith, a poor Candidate in a state of darkness,' says the Tyler,
'who has been well and worthily recommended, regularly proposed and
approved in open Lodge, and now comes of his own free will and accord,
properly prepared, humbly soliciting to be admitted to the mysteries and
privileges of Freemasonry.'
There follow several repetitions exchanges, the Inner Guard places the
point of a dagger to the Candidate's left breast. He is asked, 'Do you
The Inner Guard raises the dagger in the air, and the still blindfolded
Candidate is led by the right hand by the junior Deacon to the
kneeling-stool before the Worshipful Master, who then addresses the
Candidate for the first time.
'Mr John Smith, as no person can be made a Mason unless he is free and of
mature age, I demand of you, are you a free man and of the full age of
twenty-one years?' 'I am.'
'Thus assured, I will thank you to kneel, while the blessing of Heaven is
invoked on our proceedings.'
The Candidate kneels. The Brethren move in the prescribed manner, the
Lodge Deacons crossing their wands above the Candidate's head, while the
Worshipful Master or the Chaplain prays aloud, 'Vouchsafe Thine aid,
Almighty Father and Supreme Governor of the Universe, to our present
convention and grant that this Candidate for Freemasonry may so dedicate
and devote his life to Thy service, as to become a true and faithful
Brother among us. Endue him with a competency of Thy Divine Wisdom, so
that, assisted by the secrets of our masonic art, he may be the better
enabled to unfold the beauties of true Godliness, to the honour and glory
of Thy Holy Name.'
The Immediate Past Master says or sings, 'So mote it be.'
'Mr Smith,' continues the Worshipful Master, 'in all cases of difficulty
and danger, in whom do you put your trust?', and the Candidate replies,
'Right glad I am to find your faith so well founded. Relying on such sure
support you may safely rise and follow your leader with a firm but humble
confidence, for where the name of God is invoked we trust no danger can
The Candidate rises to his feet with the help of the Deacons. The
Worshipful Master and the Brethren sit. The Worshipful Master then gives a
single knock with his gavel. 'The Brethren from the north, east, south and
west will take notice that Mr John Smith is about to pass in view before
them, to show that he is the Candidate properly prepared, and a fit and
proper person to be made a Mason,' says the Master.
There then follows various ritual motions and the Candidate is led in a
procession around the Lodge. Arriving at the place where the junior Warden
stands, the junior Deacon takes the Candidate's right hand and taps the
junior Warden's right shoulder with it three times. The junior Warden
asks, 'Whom have you there?' 'Mr John Smith,' replies the junior Deacon,
'A poor Candidate in a state of darkness, who has been well and worthily
recommended, regularly proposed and approved in open Lodge, and now comes
of his own free will and accord, properly prepared, humbly soliciting to
be admitted to the mysteries and privileges of Freemasonry.' 'How does he
hope to obtain those privileges?'
'By the help of God, being free and of good report.'
The Junior Warden then takes the Candidate's right hand, and says to
him,'Enter, free and of good report,' and he is led to the Senior Warden,
before whom a similar exchange takes place. The Senior Warden moves to the
Worshipful Master. 'Worshipful Master,' he says, making the appropriate
sign, 'I present to you Mr John Smith, a Candidate properly prepared to be
made a Mason.'
'Brother Senior Warden,' replies the Worshipful Master, 'your presentation
shall be attended to, for which purpose I shall address a few questions to
the Candidate, which I trust he will answer with candour.' He turns to the
Candidate. 'Do you seriously declare on your honour that, unbiased by the
improper soficitation of friends against your own inclination, and
uninfluenced by mercenary or other unworthy motive, you freely and
voluntarily offer yourself a Candidate for the mysteries and privileges of
'Do you likewise pledge yourself that you are prompted to solicit those
privileges by a favourable opinion preconceived of the Institution, a
genuine desire of knowledge, and a sincere wish to render yourself more
extensively serviceable to your fellow creatures?'
'Do you further seriously declare on your honour that, avoiding fear on
the one hand and rashness on the other, you wl ill steadily persevere
through the ceremony of your initiation, and if once admitted you will
afterwards act and abide by the ancient usages and established customs of
'Brother Senior Warden, you will direct the junior Deacon to instruct the
Candidate to advance to the pedestal in due form.'
'Brother Junior Deacon, it is the Worshipful Master's command that you
instruct the Candidate to advance to the pedestal in due form.'
The Junior Deacon complies, l
the Candidate to the pedestal and instructing him to stand with his heels
together and his feet at right angles, the left foot facing east and the
right foot south. He continues: 'Take a short pace with your left foot,
bringing the heels together in the form of a square. Take another, a
little longer, heel to heel as before. Another still longer, heels
together as before.'
The Candidate is now standing before the pedestal, with the junior Deacon
to his right and the Senior Deacon to his left.
'It is my duty to inform you,' says the 'Worshipful Master, 'that Masonry
is free, and requires a perfect freedom of inclination in every Candidate
for its mysteries. It is founded on the purest principles of piety and
virtue. It possesses great and invaluable privileges. And in order to
secure those privileges to worthy men, and we trust to worthy men alone,
vows of fidelity are required. But let me assure you that in those vows
there is nothing incompatible with your civil, moral or religious duties.
Are you therefore willing to take a Solemn Obligation, founded on the
principles I have stated, to keep inviolate the secrets and mysteries of
'Then you will kneel on your left knee, your right foot formed in a
square, give me your right hand which I place on the Volume of the Sacred
Law, while your left will be employed in supporting these compasses, one
point presented to your naked left breast.'
This done, the Candidate is then made to repeat the Obligation after the
Worshipful Master, 'I, John Smith, in the presence of the Great Architect
of the Universe, and of this worthy, worshipful, and warranted Lodge of
Free and Accepted Masons, regularly assembled and properly dedicated, of
my own free will and accord, do hereby (WM touches Candidate's right band
with his left band) and hereon (WM touches the Bible with his left band)
sincerely and solemnly promise and swear, that I will always hele, conceal
and never reveal any part or parts, point or points of the secrets or
mysteries of or belonging to Free and Accepted Masons in Masonry, which
may heretofore have been known by me, or shall now or at any future period
he communicated to me, unless it be to a true and lawful Brother or
Brothers, and not even to him or them, until after due trial, strict
examination, or sure information from a well-known Brother, that he or
they are worthy of that confidence, or in the body of a just, perfect, and
regular Lodge of Ancient Freemasons. I further solemnly promise that I
will not write those secrets, indite, carve, mark, engrave or otherwise
them delineate, or cause or suffer it to be so done by others, if in my
power to prevent it, on anything movable or immovable, under the canopy of
Heaven, whereby or whereon any letter, character or figure, or the least
trace of a letter, character or figure, may become legible, or
intelligible to myself or anyone in the world, so that our secret arts and
hidden mysteries may improperly become known through my unworthiness.
These several points I solemnly swear to observe, without evasion,
equivocation, or mental reservation of any kind, under no less a penalty,
on the violation of any of them, than that of having my throat cut across,
my tongue tom out by the root, and buried in the sand of the sea at low
water mark, or a cable9s length from the shore, where the tide regularly
ebbs and flows twice in twenty-four hours, or the more effective
punishment of being branded as a wilfully perjured individual, void of all
moral worth, and totally unfit to be received into this worshipful Lodge,
or any other warranted Lodge or society of men, who prize honour and
virtue above the external advantages of rank and fortune. So help me, God,
and keep me steadfast in this my Great and Solemn Obligation of an Entered
of the most important reference points for finding out whether or not an
individual is a freemason is the 'Masonic Yearbook' - see notes
and queries below
Ernest, A Comprehensive Dictionary of Freemasonry (Arco Publications,
BOX, Hubert S., The Nature of Freemasonry (Augustine Press, 1952)
CAHILL, E., Freemasonry and the Anti-Christian Movement (Gill and Son,
CARLILE, Richard, Manual of Freemasonry (Wm Reeves,
CARR, Harry, The Freemason at Work (Lewis Masonic, 1976).
COVEY-CRUMP, Rev, The Hiramic Tradition, (London,1937).
COX, Barry, SHIRLEY , John and SHORT, Martin, The Fall of Scotland Yard
DEWAR, james, The Unlocked Secret (William Kimber, 1966).
FITZWALTER, Raymond and TAYLOR, David, Web of Corruption (Granada, 1981)
GOULD, R. F., History of Freemasonry (Caxton, 1951).
HANNAH, Walton, Darkness Visible (Augustine Press,1952); Christian by
Degrees (Britons Publishing Co 1954).
JONES, Bernard E., Freemasons' Book of the Royal Arch (Harrap, 1957);
Freemasons's Guide and Compendium (Harrap, 1950).
'JUBELUM', Freemasonry and the Church of England Reconciled (Britons
Publishing Co 1951).
KNIGHT, Stephen, Jack the Ripper.. The Final Solution (Harrap, 1976).
LAWRENCE, Rev John, Freemasonry - A Way of Salvation? (Grove Books, 1982).
LAWRENCE, Rev John T., Masonicjurispradence (A. Lewis,1923).
LENNHOFF, Eugen, The Freemasons (A. Lewis, 1934).
LEPPER, J. Herron, The Traditioners (Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, vol 56,
Quatuor Coronati Lodge, no 2076).
LEO XIII, POPE, Humanum Genus, 1884 (Britons Publishing Co, 1952).
MACKENZIE, Norman (Editor), Secret Societies (Aldus, 1967).
MACKEY, Albert G., Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry (3 vols) (Macoy Publishing
and Supply Co, Richmond, Virginia, 1946).
MORGAN, William, Freemasonry Exposed (Glasgow,1836).
NEWTON, Joseph Fort, The Builders.. A Story and Study of Freemasonry (Hogg,
1917; Allen and Unwin, 1918).
PICK, Fred L. and KNIGHT, G. Norman, The Pocket History of Freemasonry
(Frederick Muller, 1953).
PINCHER, Chapman, Tbei'r Trade is Treachery (Sidgwick and jackson, 1981).
RAINSBURY, Rev A. W., Freemasonry - of God or the Devil? (substance of a
sermon preached in Emmanuel Church, South Croydon, 1959).
RUMBLE, Dr L., Catholics and Freemasonry (Catholic Truth Society
THURSTON, H., Freemasonry (CTS pamphlet).
'VINDEX', Light Invisible, A Freemason's Answer to Darkness Visible
(Britons Publishing Co, 1952).
VOORHISS. H. V. B., Factsfor Freemasons (Macoy Publishing Co, 1951,
WHALEN, William j., Christianity and American Freemasonry (Bruce
Publishing Co, Milwaukee, 1958).
Magazine and Masonic Mirror
Freemasons' Montbly Remembrancer
Freemasons' Quarterly Review
of the Antient Fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons under the United
Grand Lodge of England (UGL, London, 1917).
the preceding texts quoted from: Knight, Stephen, The Brotherhood, The
Secret World Of The Freemasons, 1983-, ISBN 0 586 05983 0 - currently out
Short's book: 'Inside The Brotherhood'
is no reason why Masonry should clash with council business. But I can't
tell you anything about it.'
the Brotherhood has its origins in the pioneering work of Stephen
Knight who died [of cancer of the brain] in July 1985 aged thirty-three,
just eighteen months after the publication of his bestselling,
controversial and much-disputed exposé of Freemasonry, The Brotherhood.
Had he lived, Stephen would have written his own sequel. Instead I
stepped, almost literally, into a dead man's shoes. I tracked down many of
his sources and read hundreds of letters sent in response to his book but
which he never pursued because of illness. More than three years after his
death, fanmail still pours in for him from all over the world.
us you're a mason! p.408
futile was the 1985 resolution by the London Borough of Enfield that all
councillors should declare membership of societies such as the Masons. Two
years later the Enfield Gazette discovered only twenty out of
twenty-eight Labour councillors had filled in the confidential form, just
one admitting he was 'on the square'. Of thirty-eight Tories only fourteen
complied, none of whom was a Mason. Yet the newspaper claimed at least ten
Tory councillors were in the Craft. Labour councillors said they suspected
Enfield was run by Masons but one Tory who publicly admitted he was a
member retorted: 'There is no reason why Masonry should clash with council
business. But I can't tell you anything about it.'
family come second, p.599
are reluctant to unleash the full force of law against an offending
brother. Their dilemma is clear from a letter which I received from the
son of the late Sir George Evetts, Master of Ewell Lodge (no.1851) some
fifty years ago.
In 1932 I persuaded my father to buy me a motor-cycle. He quibbled for
days as to paying £35 instead of £30 which he considered ample, and kept
on lecturing me on 'the value of money'. Eventually he gave in and I
thanked him. The sequel came in 1941 when I was serving as an officer in
the RNVR [Royal Navy Volunteer Reserve].
One Saturday afternoon Father was driving with Mother to Croydon for a
very important Lodge meeting. On the outskirts of the town the bombs began
to fall and she begged him to abandon the trip. He refused and stated the
meeting was very important and he must attend. When I
came home on leave in 1942 Mother told me of this incident and said,
'The blessed Masons are more important than any of us. I will now tell you
that ten years ago, three weeks after father argued about an extra £5 for
your motor-bike, the telephone rang. It was the master of the Lodge
telling Father that the Treasurer had left his wife and taken the Lodge's
funds of £1,300 - plus a lady friend! Father offered between £600 and £800
as his share towards making up the loss. I told him he should not give his
hard-earned money to protect a rogue. His reply was to sulk in his study
and say, "You do not understand. As a well-to-do brother, I am honour-bound
to replace so much, so that we do not prosecute."'
extracts from: Short, Martin, Inside The Brotherhood, Further Secrets Of
The Freemasons, Harper Collins, Grafton, 1989-, ISBN 0 586 07065 6 -
currently out of print
pro and anti masonic chit-chat
my Masonic Brother Voltaire once said: " I don't agree with a single
word you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it!" I
am an American Freemason, but one whom has visited a number of my English
Brethren (some of whom are relatives).
reading your various pages, it appears to me that you write as an
intelligent person, and one who has a passionate desire to help others.
How ironic it is then that you have the stance against Freemasonry that
you do. For if you really understood the tenets of Freemasonry, then you
would probably avoid the such tirades against the fraternity. I think this
stems from ignorance on your part. I mean this not as a slight, but as a
truth. I consider myself a fairly intelligent person, but the more I learn
proves to me just how ignorant I myself am. I would only ask that you do
some more reading and - Question, question, question, everything that you
read. Don't allow personal biases to influence your judgement. Gather all
the facts- (in this case some-PRO with the con,) assess these and then
come to a decided stance. I have both of Mr. Knight's books, and other
anti-Masonic literature in my library. I feel obliged to hear what others
say, and seek to refute it with fact (whenever possible). This is quite
easy to do with Mr.Knight's works. I recommend to you 'BORN IN BLOOD' by
John Robinson, (an elderly scholar who was not a Mason, but later became
one, only two years before his death). He wrote on the origins of
Freemasonry and their ties to the Knights Templar (another much maligned
group). Mr. Robinson has an entire section in his book where he discusses
"The Brotherhood," et al, and refutes it easily ...fact by fact.
American Freemasonry differs from the English, but this is more in the
social aspects than common beliefs and tradition. We American Masons find
it anathema to recruit candidates. One must ask to join our ranks, we
don't pick and choose. This policy is firmly adhered to, and is actually
detrimental in today's society (where few know anything of our fraternity.
Recruitment is relatively commonplace in England, where I have found such
instances as a cousin, who is a constable for Devon-Cornwall Police, being
told that he needed to join if he expected to advance. This would be
unheard of in America. Without lambasting my English Brothers, I will say
that, again, our beliefs and traditions, at least, are still one and the
Masons our basic tenets are set in 'Friendship, Truth and Brotherly
Love." We believe that all people are created by the Deity as equals.
Material wealth, social status, etc. is taught to be unimportant. What
counts is a man's heart; that he live uprightly (in whatever way he
chooses) and believes in the Deity. This applies to women and children as
well for in America we have a Masonic branch for them also (Eastern Star,
Job's Daughters, and DeMolay).
I speak of the Deity, I refer to one omnipotent, benevolent, Supreme
Creator. We Masons are composed of Sikhs, Hindus, Christians, Muslims,
Buddhists, etc. All one must do is profess faith in a benevolent, Supreme
Being. Thusly; a tenet of Masonry is tolerance. As long as one strives to
live uprightly, and believes in a benevolent Supreme Being one is to
choose his own path. Discussion of religion or politics is absolutely
forbidden in Lodge, as these can be divisive (as one might push his
beliefs or views on others- resulting in disharmony).
apologize if I appear to be proselytizing, but I wanted to make this all
clear to you before proceeding into my next rant. Now that I've covered
the ideals of Freemasonry, I will agree that not all is a bed or roses. As
human-beings we are all fallible creatures, no less in Freemasonry. There
are those who use it to gain status, and advantage, but those who do so
violate the very oath taken upon their admission- that they seek
enlightenment, and support the tenets of the fraternity, and swear that
they are not joining for any mercenary reasons.
until only a decade or so ago, much of American Masonry, had a sad
tradition of working to exclude people based on skin color and ethnicity.
In the Black community, this resulted in Blacks forming their own branch
of Freemasonry called "Prince Hall Masonry." Many of us,
especially we younger Brethren, have worked to put an end to this
anti-Masonic evil within our own fraternity. I can only speak for
California, but as such an ethnically diverse state, we had (and really
still have) only had a sprinkling of Blacks, Jews, Sikhs, etc. in our
overall ranks. We in California, were some of the first to openly
recognize Prince Hall Masons, and now visit one another's Lodges. In doing
this, I and all California Masons, were technically seen as having
'violated the rules,' by accepting 'clandestine/false Masons' and could
have be ostracized by Lodges in other States and countries. This included
England- who actually issued an edict stating this! Our goal is to now
work to make our fraternity what it is truly meant to be- a place for ALL
thank you for taking the time to hear me out.
Lloyd MacKenzie Parker
for taking the time to write... Sounds like your objections to racial
discrimination will have an effect. I think it's trully couragoeus to
break with tradition backing principles of basic human respect.
me make my objection to masonry clear. It is the very lack of free speech
(which you celebrate above) and culture of secrecy and deception of the
lower degrees by the highter degrees that warns me off. Its a bit like the
problem we have with government... you can be governed by its rules
without the transparency that you need to say you really believe in
somthing. In the case of govt. none of us choose to put ourselves under
government yet we're all subject to its laws. I am an idealist I admit...
but I believe the human race can only live in harmony (without JFK
assassinations and Gulf Wars waged by corporations and banks for oil) if
we do it openly and honestly. Masonry is the very antithesis of openness!
Who knows 33rd degree masons well enough to know how deeply good they are?
Do they give you the creeps when you meet them? All these questions I want
answers to AND my Christian faith precludes me worshipping any other than
Jesus Christ and Yahweh the God of the Old Testament.
also abhor all forms of priviledge. These top masons might be a fine
old dudes if billions of people weren't starving hungry!
said... thanks for your compliments about my intelligence... I am sorry to
tell you my IQ is abnormally low. Probably because I couldn't be bothered
with the stupid test!
of masonic councillors
The Guardian Newspaper 17-12-97 N&Q
could I find out which members of my local council are freemasons?
first route is to obtain a copy of the Masonic Yearbook (available for £12,
inc p&p, from Freemasons Hall, Great Queen Street, London WC2B 5AZ).
This is an encyclopaedia of the masonic fraternity's nationwide structure
and contains a who's who of hundreds of leading freemasons. Check this
list as a starting point.
Each area also has a listing of all its masonic lodges and chapters,
indeed, the yearbook reveals that, for the questioner's address, a borough
of Greenwich Lodge - number 2332 - was founded in 1888. It undoubtably
serves as a lodge for both masonic councillors and council officers in
Greenwich. The masonic yearbook reveals that this lodge holds its annual
inaugural meeting at Freemason's Hall in Covent Garden on the third
Saturday each December - this year Saturday 20th. Simply turn up on the
day and watch your local masonic councillors arrive for the event!
Alternatively, a foolproof method of identifying masonic councillors is to
ask a friendly non-mason councillor to table a motion at the next full
council meeting proposing that the council should set up its own voluntary
register of freemasons. Whether or not the motion is carried, under local
government regulations, all councillors who are freemasons will have to
declare an interest before the matter is debated, and thus reveal their
status. David Northmore London WC2
I was a Labour councillor in Greenwich in the eighties, we adopted a
policy of councillors declaring membership of masonic lodges and other
associations in the register of members' interests. As a Greenwich
resident, the questioner should contact the Town Hall and ask about
relevant entries. This move was part of a wider debate about masonic
influence, including their use of community buildings.
During a discussion on this issue, a senior officer sought to explain that
he believed the "modern" masonic movement was open to all. A
formidable Tory lady then asked: "I assume you mean all men?"
The hapless officer said he understood there were now ladies' lodges. In a
comment that managed to offend both sides of the argument, a junior
officer then asked if they were called the masonettes. Ron Robinson
Greenwich, London SE10
and Queries appears in The Guardian newspaper and has its
Deadly Deception: Freemasonry Exposed - Jim Shaw & Tom McKenney
- Jim Shaw was one of the top leaders of Freemasonry: 33rd Degree
Mason, Knight Commander of the Court of Honor, Past Worshipful Master-Blue
Lodge, Past Master of all Scottish Rite bodies, when he became a Christian
and left. He exposes Freemasonry as he experienced it. $9.95+ $4.00
S&H 207 pp. from: http://www.thecomingbattle.com/more%20books3.html
in the west country http://www.rose-associates.demon.co.uk
Wigged Mafia' - masonic malpractice in the judiciary http://www.citizenbeware.com/MW1.html
the following articles (complete versions you might have to pay for) links
are immediately below.
KINGDOM: The Freemasons and Police
the British police fallen under the sway of Freemasons? The boss of
Scotland Yard and officials at the Home Office say they are worried about
the Freemasons' influence over senior police officers. Several cases of
corruption are said to have been covered up at the bidding of the
least one in seven male magistrates in the U.K. are members of the
Freemason brotherhood, according to a first official survey of the
judiciary's links with the secret organization. The survey was (...)
KINGDOM: FREEMASONS BEND TO PRESSURE
officers and local government officials figure largely among the 50
British Freemasons who have resigned from their lodges on claims their
careers would be damaged if they were publicly identified as members of
"the Craft," according to John Hamill, curator, librarian and
spokesman for the Un (...)
[Total = 2199 characters]
KINGDOM: FINGER-POINTING AT FREEMASONS
Purser, president of the United Grand Lodge of England's Board of General
Purposes, has reluctantly given the names of 16 Freemasons linked to a
number of controversial police investigations in the 1970s and 1980s to
Chris Mullin, chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee, after being
thr (...) [Total
= 2169 characters]
KINGDOM: THE PARLIAMENT WANTS NAMES OF FREEMASONS
officials of the ruling council of British Freemasonry, the United Grand
Lodge of England (UGL) , face charges of contempt of parliament if they
fail to provide the Commons Select Committee on Home Affairs with the
names of 163 members connected with police corruption and miscarriages of
j (...) [Total =
KINGDOM: FREEMASONS AND THE JUDICIARY
Association of Women Barristers (AWB) has recommended to the Commons Home
Affairs committee that members of the Freemason Brotherhood who are
appointed as judges should either resign their Masonic membership on the
occasion or at least declare it publicly. (...)
[Total = 1746 characters]
KINGDOM: FREDERICK CRAWFORD
minister John Major has personally appointed a Freemason, Frederick
Crawford, to the £80,000-per-year, part-time post as chairman of the new
Criminal Cases Review Authority (CCRA). The move came (...)
[Total = 1620 characters]
KINGDOM: NEW WARNING ON MASON LINKS
Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has drawn up national
guidelines warning police officers that membership of the Freemasons (or
other secretive and influential societies) could "compromise their
integrity as impartial upholders of the law. [Total
= 1673 characters]
KINGDOM: MASONIC SECRETS INTACT
that a House of Commons select committee on home affairs might provide
details of alleged Masonic penetration of the judiciary and the police (IN
259) are "receding into the distance" because of a backlog of
business that the committee has to deal with, according to a Conservative
[Total = 1888 characters]
KINGDOM: ANOTHER POKE IN EYE FOR MASONS
Metropolitan Police commissioner, Paul Condon, has ordered that all
officers with links to the Freemason Brotherhood be ousted from Scotland
Yard's anti-corruption unit. The move came after a (...)
[Total = 1640 characters]
KINGDOM: FREEMASONS MAY BE PROBED
House of Commons committee of all-party MP's headed by Lord Nolan will
shortly consider examining the role and influence of the Brotherhood of
Freemasons within the British establishment. The comm (...)
[Total = 1712 characters]
KINGDOM: POLICE SUPPORT FREEMASON SECRECY
the first-ever debate of its kind, the Police Federation rejected a motion
by 429 votes to 391 to compel all officers belonging to the Freemason
Brotherhood or other secret societies to declare their membership
= 1808 characters]
KINGDOM: A PUBLIC LIST OF GOVERNMENT FREEMASONS?
MP Chris Mullin's Secret Societies (Declaration) Bill is due for its
second reading on 29 January 1993. The bill would place most public
servants, including police, under a legal obligation to (...)
[Total = 273 characters]
KINGDOM: JOHN SMITH
Smith, Deputy Police Commissioner, Scotland Yard, is the strong favorite
to become the next Commissioner of the "Met", succeeding Sir
Peter Imbert, who is likely to resign in the autumn after a five year
term. [Total =
to complete articles
symbols - an insight http://www.reachouttrust.org/fremsym.htm
Grand Lodge of Scotland http://www.grandlodgescotland.com/
Freemasons Worship Satan? http://www.cth.com.au/corp/despatch/worship.htm
Occult, Evil Empire Exposed http://www.execpc.com/~amerisub/chapt-04/chapt-04.html
of Freemasonry FAQ http://users.uniserve.com/~ttrevor/anti-masonry_faq.html
Secret societies and the New world order http://www.unm.edu/~hrommel/cooperNWO.html
masonic Gallery http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/9991/gallery.html
masonic exposee press http://www.crocker.com/~acacia
masonic links http://www.crocker.com/~acacia/jfklinks.html
Dangers of Freemasonry - of course it's harmless! http://www.sounddoctrine.com/ptimes/masonry.htm
sun lodge, a bit weird http://ourworld.compuserve.com/blacksun/homepage.htm
'mystery' that is freemasonry http://trojan.neta.com/~kottinge/m-main.html
by the Masons in Dorset? http://www.mical-data.demon.co.uk/story1.htm
masonic links site http://home.fireplug.net/~rshand/streams/masons/masons.html
masonry to the old Russian communist party http://www.ostara.org/autor/mason.txt
famous masons http://www.bc-freemasonry.com/TextFiles/famous.html
see extract from Stephen Knight's book (above)
If you have experienced of or been witness to any
untoward attention, why not contact the Chief Constable:-
Headquarters, Malling House, Church Lane
Sussex, BN7 2DZ
0845 6070 999
policemen are Masons. This can lead to corruption at high levels,
where fellow Masons, members of the public, might obtain favours, charges
dropped, or charges brought against someone, as examples. The law is
quite often used incorrectly (illegally) to further the objectives of
private causes. But who is there to investigate? Since many, if not most
high ranking officers are Masons, in whichever force, even an outside
force is unlikely to identify an officer who will make any effort to
investigate a fellow officer. It's a club, for a favoured few.
- Z of officer investigations
above is just a few of a number of persons likely to be investigated in
respect of certain cases brought against Wealden Action Group members, on
the instigation of known Masons, councillors, or planning officers, many
of which are themselves Masons.
Links for Masonic.
For Victims Of Masonic Abuse ? - Resource Site
Find top sites of victims of masonic abuse. LupaLink.com is the best
Best Sites For Victims Of Masonic Abuse With Swampgreen
SwampGreen is an excellent resource for quality sites on victims of m
Of Masonic Abuse In The Free Online Encyclopedia
Read about victims of masonic abuse in the free online encyclopedia a
For Victims Of Masonic Abuse In The Uk? Try Joltsearch!
JoltSearch has UK results for victims of masonic abuse and much more!
crime (political philosophy)
Legal Resource Center
of Child Abuse Laws (support group)
of Communism Memorial
of Crime Act of 1984
of Crime and Leniency
of Crime Assistance
Of Crime Association Of Queensland (Australia)
of Crime Trust (United Kingdom)
Of Health Care Abuse
Of Incest Can Emerge Survivors
of masonic abuse
of Philatelic Investment Fraud (French abbreviation)
of the 'Popish Plot' conspiracy
of the 'Popish Plot' conspiracy
of the 'Popish Plot' conspiracy
of the Age
of the Future
of the Legal Profession Society (Ireland and UK)
of the Pogrom of 1903 Memorial
of the Smiling Ass (fictional support group)
of the Triangle Shirt Waist Fire of 1911
of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000
of Violent Crime
Information Officer (Corrections Department, Montana)
This site is protected under
Article10 of the
European Convention on Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this
site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If
you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your
own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the