UNITED NATIONS

  THE UNITED KINGDOM OFFERS NO EFFECTIVE REMEDY TO INJUSTICES IN VIOLATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS DECLARATION

HOME  |  CASE STUDIES  |  HISTORY  |  HUMAN RIGHTS  |  LAW  |  POLICE   |  POLITICS  |  RIGHTS  |  SHIT CREEK  |  SITE INDEX

THE HEAD OF STATE - The British Head of State is a Grand Patron to the Royal Masonic Benevolent Institution according to the inside leaf of many yearbooks. It may be a shock to many or you to learn of this, but the revelation may go some way to explaining why it is that some people get targeted by their local authorities such as Councils and the Police.

The present British judicial system is a blight on the face of humanity in that the Courts, Crown Prosecution Service and Police forces, and further along the chain, the Criminal Cases Review Commission, are not answerable to anyone for their violations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on English soil.

There is no right of appeal in the United Kingdom, where the system as it stands gives ultimate control to the Courts and in some cases Single Judges - many of whom are masons who refuse to declare interests, most likely because it would prevent involvement in the very cases that have been brought against innocent citizens, to quash them questioning the present system

THE REMEDY

The United Kingdom needs to remedy the shortcomings of their present system by providing an effective remedy to those unlawfully convicted on biased and incomplete evidence, that was provided to a jury as some kind of whitewashing mechanism, designed to ensure a conviction where the state prosecutors, police and so-called experts must have known of the flaws in these cases, but worked together regardless of the inconsistencies in evidence to gloss over those factors to deceive the 12 members of the public who made up those juries, into delivering a verdict that the state was desirous of, to defeat free speech and challenges to the present corrupt system.

In this case there was and remains demonstrable bias contrary to R v Sussex Justices ex parte McCarthy 1924. In addition, the police raided premises to obtain Rule 39 privileged documents, supplied to the CPS - a serious abuse of process, only realised when another victim in Sussex was supplied copy of his Rule 39 documents as evidence by the CPS, his solicitor then being asked to delete the file - in doing so, they would then have become complicit to a fraudulent conviction and perversion of the course of justice. The discovery of this system of abuse of a person's right to a fair hearing, was discovered in 2021. Hot off the press, so to speak. It remains to be seen if the present Head of State is physically fit enough for an audience. As per the 1689 Bill of Rights.

ALTERNATIVE REMEDY

The UK needs to draft and approve a Written Constitution, to take away the overbearing influence of the Royals on the Judicial System and ineptitude in selecting effective Government - and refusal of the Head of State to engage in meaningful discussion as to the above. Such Constitution shall include the Right to an Effective Remedy, to eliminate bias in any Judicial Proceedings, to include the Right of Appeal in cases where bias is evident, or has become evident post conviction.

The Written Constitution shall be fully compliant with the tenets of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

 

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION  OF HUMAN RIGHTS

 

EUROPEAN CONVENTION  OF HUMAN RIGHTS

 

1689 BILL OF RIGHTS

MAGNA CARTA

This site is free of © Copyright except where specifically stated 1997 - 2021.  Any person may download, use and quote any reference or any link, and is guaranteed such right to freedom of information and speech under the Human Rights and Freedom of Information Acts.  However, be aware that we cannot be held liable for the accuracy of the information provided.  All users should therefore research matters for themselves and seek their own legal advice and this information is provided simply by way of a guide.  Horse Sanctuary Trust UK   All trademarks herby acknowledged. Contact Us.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.  FAIR USE NOTICE