BATTERING BOBBIES - Are the police official thugs wearing a British uniform that gives them a free license to destroy property. In Nazi Germany the Gestapo used similar tactics to intimidate civilians. Granted, that nobody wants to see drugs on the streets, in our homes and especially not in the hands of the young and impressionable. God forbid that these officers are armed with guns, or they might kill an innocent person as Sussex police did to James Ashley - with yet more cover up and denials.
The British Justice system is said to be riddled with Masonic corruption. So much so that some people find it hard to define who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. The CPS is said to have a high percentage of masons as do the Judges in our Courts who refuse to identify those so connected.
How then can the Courts be held to be independent - and barristers coming up through the system - who will eventually become Judges - will do most anything to please the existing Judges to get their ticket, or they will blot their copy-book and get passed over.
It is easy for a bent copper to plant evidence and even easier to fail to collect evidence that holds the potential to exonerate a person accused of a crime, let alone a sexual offence where no actual evidence is required due to changes in the law championed by David Blunkett. Talk about the blind leading the blind. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 makes anyone accused of a sexual offence: Presumed Guilty, making such investigations a witch hunt. This is of course a violation of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, the Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights where to comply with the obligations arising from human suffering and torture such as in concentration camps, even the United Kingdom signed up for Her Majesty - but at the first opportunity opted out - starting us on the slippery slope to a eugenics grounded Nazi like state where uniformed officers of the law are actually more criminal than some hardened criminals.
Let us be clear on this, an officer who fails to investigate a crime scene fully, knowing that in ignoring potentially crucial evidence he is depriving an innocent person of a fair trial - is every bit the criminal that he or she joined the force to capture. They are as bad as the officers who plant evidence to frame someone.
Does Britain care. Not in the slightest it seems. British Courts appear to love pandering to masonic interests and this tool is just one very dangerous example of a toolkit that allows police officers to do favours for masonic mates and the Courts to make new law on a daily basis where we have no written constitution. One very prominent miscarriage of justice is alleged that tends to illustrate this more than others where a Sussex man was convicted of vaginal rape, but the claimant was intact on inspection and that fact too was glossed over where the doctor carrying out the internal inspection realised that the girl's hymen was tightly closed, hence did not carry out the next part of the examination to give plod a chance to convict their target. That is almost as conclusive a result in wrongful conviction terms as when DNA proves they stitched up the wrong man.
The fact is that the masons were involved where the grandfather was the Master of a local lodge just around the corner from the Eastbourne police station in Grove Road. The police force at that time was entirely corrupt, Paul Whitehouse have just resigned in disgrace after the James Ashley investigation. Joe Edwards came into the fray without any chance of straightening out this force when a chance presented itself to nail Wealden's long term adversary and discredit him so that there was no chance of a comeback.
The only problem for Gordon Staker and whoever was giving him orders, was that he must have proceeded with the frame-up in the belief that the girl claiming rape was not a virgin, when the physical evidence said otherwise. That is when Dr Liebenberg came to the detective's rescue in stopping her examination before it was too late to recover for the prosecution - and the target could not then be charged due to the ambiguity in evidence. This was a case of her word against his. But the jury were mislead by the naughty doctor. We wonder why the favour. Did she benefit from a subsequent planning consent or was she promoted. It could just have been a favour for the social worker grandmother. Yes, that is right. The claimant's grandmother was a social worker, her mother a psychiatric nurse and her grandfather a very well connected former mason.
What was in this force's favour was that the girl and her mother (a single parent family before entrapping the defendant) had urged the defendant to send them Valentines Day cards and then kept those cards as some kind of pre-meditated evidential trap. They both knew that a prosecution could make great play with those (and they did) if they needed to enlist the help of their grandfather's chums to force the man to stay engaged to the mother. Both females had warned the hapless victim not to leave the family or they would "get you [him]."
The barrister knew there was evidence to prove that the mother had reminded the target to send Valentines cards in his diary, in her hand writing, but it appears from the facts of the case that he had no intention of mounting any kind of defence that would win. He repeatedly refused to challenge the so-called medical evidence.
The Criminal Cases Review Commission also appear to have been in on the eugenics side of things, where they managed to get three High Court Judges to agree that discrimination was lawful. We bet you don't believe any of this, but it is all true and documented.
In our not so Great Britain, there is no effective remedy as per Article 13. Yup, you guessed it, not only did we doctor Article 6 with the Sexual Offences Act 2003, but we also managed to forget to include Article 13 in our domestic legislation. This combination of Human Rights abuses means that anyone wrongly convicted under British law, can never obtain justice. You see, there is no right of appeal in British law. There is a single judge who says who will, and who won't get the chance of an appeal - all without any actual hearing or seeing any new evidence. This is another HR violation.
And so, much as we feel strongly that children should be protected from harm, we also believe that this country should have a proper safety net for miscarriages of justice. At the moment we have kangaroo courts. Any serving officer in any force who knows anything about Human Rights is sure to realise the Sussex police are bringing all of the UK's forces into disrepute with the frame up that we have outlined here.
Why? Because in 1997 the target was a member of the Wealden Action Group. In 1997 a Petition was presented to Wealden District Council asking them to investigate corruption in their Council. They agreed that the investigation should go to the police, who failed to interview a single complainant, or a single officer of the council. The CPS were in on it, when a letter was read to the full council exonerating the corrupt officers, written on Sussex police headed paper, but crafted by the officers of the crooked council, allegedly.
The problem was that the target would not leave it there, but kept on winning cases against this council in the planning arena. This Council had also tried to remove the toilets at their victim's home and declared umpteen times in Courts and at Appeals that his home was not a historic building. Once again, the protagonists fouled up when English Heritage said it was. In the meantime this perverse council had spent fortunes of taxpayer's money painting their adversary to be some kind of lunatic for claiming otherwise. So, as you might imagine, when the truth about this also emerged it made them rather uncomfortable and desperate for some kind of face saver.
Enter a mother and daughter with a grudge, following the break up of an engagement. All social services had to do was groom the girl and get her mother to hide any contradictory evidence. She went along with it and as it turns out the girl was an attention seeker who lapped up all this attention. Each time she strayed from the story the police wanted to hear, social services steered the girl back to the story that had been implanted. Such grooming is called coaching, and coaching is not allowed in our legal system.
Oh yes, what about this case then! It sounds like the legal system has raped poor old Mr Kruschandl to us. There is only one way to find out, a judicial review or a referral to the Court of Appeal where a proper examination of the facts must include full disclosure of all social services actions, full disclosure of the non-examination and instruction of medical and forensic experts to look at the finances of the girl's mother and the diary that she hid in her loft. This is important where she is thought to have been claiming benefits while holding a capital sum.
It might also be useful to know who in Sussex police were masons at the time, and which of the Judges and CPS prosecutors and solicitors were masons. You might also want to consider that the masonic grandfather had groomed the target as a suitor for his daughter. It was not the other way round.
Another possible explanation is that the girl was prone to screen memories, where she had a wheelchair and crutches fixation. Screen memories can be implanted so that a person actually believes that what is suggested to then as being true; actually happened. This could explain why she was intact and why the diary shows no opportunity. This is the work diary that Judge Cedric Joseph wrongly attributed to the defendant in his summing up.
TRUTH OR ATTENTION SEEKING - Nobody likes it when a family breaks up. The children become emotionally unstable and want revenge, to lash out at the disturbance in the lives - and who can blame them. Families should stay together, but these days broken homes all to often lead to dysfunctionality. Statistically, these children are more likely to make up stories, just to gain attention, with no thought of the consequences for calling an adult a child molester. Under the present system no proof is needed to gain a conviction, just the say so of a child who has already been primed in school as to what to say to get special care, when that may be something they are starved of.
No blame then on the children who may be prone to tell stories, more blame on the adults who coach them. There must be a way of providing care for families that break up other than the police grooming them to improve prosecution statistics.
GRIMSBY TELEGRAPH 11 MAY 2018
GRIMSBY LIVE - 13 JULY 2017
RESPONSIBILITY & RESTRAINT - If the police feel they must use firearms instead of brains to assault a possible suspect's house, they should be sent on anger management courses, have perfect vision and be equipped with body armour. Then, there is a better chance that a trigger-happy bobby might not shoot a naked man.
Humberside police say they want to hear from officers who want to follow a career as an ARV officer.
They say their ARV officers are deployed daily to increase the feelings of confidence and the security of the public and to protect them against any threat that should occur within their area and beyond.
The Humberside Police Force area covers the rural East Riding and North Lincolnshire along with the coastal area of North East Lincolnshire and with the City of Hull at its heart.
United Kingdom law allows the use of "reasonable force" in order to make an arrest or prevent a crime or to defend oneself. However, if the force used is fatal, then the European Convention of Human Rights only allows "the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary". Firearms officers may therefore only discharge their weapons "to stop an imminent threat to life".
is said to be a very desirable place to live and work. It boasts some of England's most attractive countryside and some truly vibrant towns, all with transport links to Leeds, Manchester, London and the South. We have Humberside Airport in our Jurisdiction but are only a hour away from Doncaster airport and 1 ½ hours from Manchester and Leeds/Bradford airports.
are looking for Roads Policing Officers and Firearms Officers to transfer to Humberside Police.
They’ve recently reviewed the staffing, structures and locations of our Specialist Operations Command, which includes Roads Policing and Firearms, and are exploring the creation of a South Bank specialist operation base this year to support our local community policing.
If you are interested in transferring to Humberside Police and would like to know more about these roles please contact Ch/Supt Darren Wildbore, Head of Specialist Operations Command - Darren.email@example.com
THE HODDINOTT & WILDING REPORTS
The Wilding report found a complete failure of corporate duty by Sussex
police. The Hampshire inquiry concluded that three police officers lied about intelligence in order to persuade Deputy Chief Constable Mark Jordan to authorise the raid. The report found that the raid was
The report also showed that the guidelines on firearms put together by the Association of Chief Police Officers was breached. Experts on firearms and the law told Kent police that even if the intelligence had been correct, the firearms should not have been authorised.
CONTACT HUMBERSIDE POLICE
In an emergency, when life is in immediate danger or a crime is in progress, call 999. They don't give any address or other contact information on their website. Typically, this is a sign of a corrupt force. We stress that we have no evidence to support that, it is merely a statistic derived from other local authority websites where they do not want you to know too much about their management. For all we know, Humberside could have a higher than average percentage of non-masons - and maybe even would consider prosecuting a corrupt council official.
WHY JOIN HUMBERSIDE POLICE ?
A relocation/removal expenses of up to a maximum £8000 to transferring officers who live outside the force area and at least 50 miles from their permanent place of work
KATY BOURNE - Was elected Crime Commissioner, taking office with an oath to serve the public interest. That is an oath that many are now questioning, where she appears to be serving Sussex Police instead of policing the organisation that has come under such flack for their blatant refusal to investigate so many complaints of malfeasance in public office. What is plain is that where there is criticism of her alleged inaction, that she works with other forces to quash what many might agree is freedom of speech. In the case of Matt Taylor obtaining an injunction and in the case of John Hoath (gun crime allegation) threatening an injunction.
York is the chief constable of Sussex
Police taking over from a long chain of chief constables,
including Paul Whitehouse, who was finally
forced to resign after the Home Secretary insisted that he should go for
bringing the force into disrepute from his attempt to cover up the Jimmy
Ashley murder. Each
time one chief resigns, the next candidate learns from the mistakes of
his predecessor and makes effort not to be tripped up in the same way.
Unfortunately, that is not helping the situation, where in-effect Mr
York has nobody looking over his shoulder to make sure that he is not
breaking the law. The most common way of breaking the law, is simply
doing nothing when a crime is reported - so becoming party to the crime,
as with the Petition
scandal in 1997.
HOME OFFICE LINKS
POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AND FEDERATION LINKS
NATIONAL SERVICES LINKS
A - Z OF SUSSEX POLICE OFFICER INVESTIGATIONS
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
This site is free of © Copyright except where specifically stated 2018. Any person may download, use and quote any reference or any link, and is guaranteed such right to freedom of information and speech under the Human Rights and Freedom of Information Acts. However, be aware that we cannot be held liable for the accuracy of the information provided. All users should therefore research matters for themselves and seek their own legal advice and this information is provided simply by way of a guide. Horse Sanctuary Trust. All trademarks herby acknowledged.