Niall Mileman is a Planning Enforcement officer at Wealden District Council. It is alleged that he works with Natural England, as some part of alliance to thwart legitimate agricultural enterprise.
He has a duty to ensure that information presented to the Secretary of State at appeals, and/or the courts is accurate, such as not to fall foul of the Fraud Act 2006. He is charged with seeking to deny farmers their permitted development rights, to prevent the erection of fencing for the control of agricultural animals. It is alleged that he has been involved in planning enforcement cases on the Pevensey Levels, where his council worked to build costs of £90,000 against one farmer, with fines of £40,000. This was in the Magistrates Court in Brighton.
How can a simple enforcement matter amount to so much? Easy really. You employ the most expensive solicitors and barristers and make sure they are at the other end of the country. Don't you think that costs in cases like this should be capped, to at least Legal Aid levels. That would level the playing field a bit.
We ask you members of the public, is that morally right? Is it right to target one farmer, because he is either wealthy or of foreign origin. Is this how we want our taxes spent and why did we fight two World Wars to prevent fascism and dictatorships, just to hand the reigns to Nazi-like officials who have attained positions of trust in public office, and who are not being rotated to prevent the build up of cozy relationships.
Any officer of this council not blowing the whistle, is likely to come under suspicion for malfeasance in public office and malicious prosecution. The pictures below are those of the officers of this council who have consistently lied to Planning Inspectors and the Courts, or who have aided and abetted those who have. Perhaps we should award them the Iron Cross?
Victorio Patrick Scarpa & David Whibley
Christine Nuttall & David Phillips
At the moment the Sussex Police appear to have granted their chums at Wealden immunity from prosecution. The law is though clear, where an instrument was obtained by deception some time ago and limitations may have applied, if that instrument is being used today, then the method by which the instrument was obtained may be the subject of a criminal investigation under the provisions of the Fraud Act 2006. In other words a fraud committed before enactment of the Fraud Act 2006, may be looked at under the provisions of that Act, because the fraud is being committed anew in 2013.
Niall Mileman is the latest Wealden officer to come under suspicion in terms of malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office. Sussex Police are once again invited to investigate - and no doubt will do their level best to do nothing at all - which makes Sussex Police party to the crime. It is a criminal offence to know of a possible crime, but not to investigate it. having read this page, Niall, you must now do something about it. It is no longer acceptable to turn a blind eye. See the extract of the Fraud Act below:
FRAUD ACT 2006
Section 4 - Fraud by abuse of position [such as a planning or police officer]
(1) A person is in breach of this section if he —
dishonestly abuses that position, and
intends, by means of the abuse of that position—
to make a gain for himself or another, or
to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2)A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.
COMMENT - If an Enforcement Notice is upheld it must be complied with within a specified period. Non-compliance does then become a criminal offence which may result in the offender being taken to Court.
The maximum fine for non-compliance of a valid Enforcement Notice is £20,000.Contact us if you think that development is proceeding without the benefit of planning permission or that conditions imposed on a planning permission are being breached.
WDC's Planning Enforcement Officers and advertised area of cover. But please note that they like to play in each others area when a case gets too hot to handle - and where does Christine Arnold fit into all of this:
Vicarage Lane, Hailsham,
East Sussex, BN27 2AX T: 01323 443322
Abbott Trevor - Alcock Charmain - Ditto - Arnold Chris (Christine) - Barakchizadeh Lesley - Paul Barker - Black Julian - Boakes Beverley
Brigginshaw Marina - Brown Ashley - Coffey Patrick - Douglas Sheelagh - Dowsett Timothy - Flemming Mike - Forder Ralph - Garrett Martyn
Goodwin Daniel - Henham J - Holness Derek - Hoy Thomas - Johnson Geoff - Kavanagh Geoff - Kay Ian - Kay I. M. - Barbara Kingsford
Lant Charles - Mercer Richard - Mileman Niall - Moon Craig - Moss Douglas, J. - Nuttall Christine - Pettigrew Rex - Phillips David - Scarpa Victorio
Scott Trevor - Kevin Stewart - Wakeford M. - Whibley David - White, George - Williams Kelvin - Wilson Kenneth - White Steve
www.dailymail.co.uk Amanda Knox victim anti American trial Hillary Clinton launch investigation
Sexual cannibalism in humans is commonplace where the (UK) state still pays bunny-boilers to fabricate allegations - despite the untenable ratio of false allegations. This is called Noble Cause Corruption, so named because the cause (more convictions of rapists and perverts) is noble, but the means (convicting significant numbers of innocent men) is corrupt. A decent justice system is one where convictions are safe; where an appeal is guaranteed and where the court system does not refuse appellants the evidence for their barristers to perfect grounds of appeal. Unlike most European countries, the right of appeal in the UK in not mandatory and the discretionary single judge paper system is open to startling abuses. This book is based on a real case study, that reveals the fatal flaws in the English justice system. No man in England is safe until these issues are dealt with - it could happen to anyone.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
This site is protected under Article10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.