COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRIC NURSES (CPNs)

HOME | A-Z INDEX | MEMBERS | MPS | OFFICERS

In the case we are following where a man was convicted of rape of a young girl, apart from the fact that the girl was "tightly closed", there was also no signs of tearing of the fourchette, or other trauma associated with digital penetration (without foreplay = dry). The girl claimed regular assaults of this type that would have produced scars and the like in 83% of cases, but there were no scars, a finding which is clearly inconsistent with her claims.

A partial notch was found in the hymen, but it is now known that such findings are normal. Tears and the like in the hymen are full width if caused by trauma, leaving scar tissue, rather than partial (a smooth small indentation) as in naturally occurring features. This was not explained to the jury, who were left believing that there was no explanation for the 'notch' other than penetrative sex, when in fact it was a naturally occurring feature in all females of all ages. Yet, an innocent man was sent to prison by the system. In this case the so-called expert used her position of trust to mislead the Jury, by way of helping the police to gain a conviction of a dissident resident who was making waves as to this force failing to investigate crime in Wealden District Council. One way of neutralising political opponents is to discredit them with a sexual allegation. After that, nobody is likely to believe anything they say.

Some might call nurses who work in the community to combat mental health issues, social workers. But what do they do and what $dollar value are they when it comes to your hard earned council taxes?

Many of these so-called nurses are out for a free ride. As a branch of the psychology industry, itself mostly built on psychobabble, we wonder if they do anything worthwhile or merely fill a post for legal reasons.

One CPN that know about admitted to suicidal tendencies and was so desperate to keep a partner that she threatened him should he think of leaving her and her family, where she was a single mother with two children.

That of itself is a social issue, and certainly any woman who feels that she has to threaten a partner to keep him, is probably suffering from mental health issues. Would she then be capable of working in the community effectively. And how did she get this job?

As a case study of what the tax payer is funding, you might be in the public interest to know that this woman helped her daughter to frame a man we believe to be innocent. She did indeed threaten to get her unfortunate partner, and so did her daughter. We cannot name and shame them for legal reasons, where the law gives immunity to those making allegations of a sexual nature.

What is interesting is that this nurse broke quite a few of the Codes of Conduct rules that nurses who work in the community are bound by. She entertained her clients at her home. She lied to the courts about her finances and denied that her partner was living with her. She was claiming income support when she had a capital sum in excess of £24,000 pounds. She was obtaining rents from a garage that she did not declare.

Her former partner had left her and was not paying child support. He had children elsewhere and the agencies could not track him down.